neither
The rook or the bishop

#3 is the best answer but it's almost impossibly rare that you would have the choice of equal sacrifices from a Rook and Bishop at the same time. A sacrifice leads to an imbalanced position and it's the nature of the imbalance which determines whether it's a good idea or not. You should choose the sacrifice that, in your own estimation, will cause enough problems for your opponent for you to win the game.

A bishop is a diagonal rook but we play in a direct linear way so it is being said that a rook is more easy to use or 5 points. Some players have grown up capable of playing in a diagonal cross way and they evaluate the rook equal with the bishop. But can we who remained thinking chess to be capable to evaluate the knight equal with the rook. The knight is one tempo slower but moves awkwardly!
if y'all had a decision would you sacrifice the rook or the bishop
