This is because of the way openings start out with just a few moves and branch out in countless directions. Nobody intentionally sat down to give it that long and convoluted name, opening explorer just includes the names of the main opening (Vienna) and the main variation it came from and adds them all up. You can do the same for any other opening.
Like the Marshall Attack
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 O-O 8. c3 d5
If you were to add up all the names of opening names it has before you get to the Marshall you would have to call it the "King's Pawn Opening: King's Knight Variation, Ruy Lopez, Morphy Defence, Columbus Variation, Marshall Attack"
This is of course ridiculous so people just call it the Marshall
Apparantly I played
C27: Vienna Game: Frankenstein-Dracula, Boden-Kieseritzky, Lichtenhein Defense
1.e4 e5 2.Nc3 Nf6 3.Bc4 Nxe4 4.Nf3 d5
Of course, I never played anything like that, at least not intentionally.
All I did was play some moves and turns out what I did is being categorized under that unwieldy monstrosity of a name collection.
Frankenstein-Dracula ? For real ?
Has naming in theory gotten a *tiny bit* out of hand maybe ?
What will the future bring ? Will we add ever new and more (and ridiculous!) names to more and more parts of the game until the complete game including the endgame can be discribed by a series of 26 names ?