This has always been the case for computer chess software: positional factors are harder to evaluate and get correct than material considerations. This is true for humans, as well, I might add. However, some of the software out there claims to be better at this than others. Indeed, professional players will usually own more than one, in order to get the advice from multiple perspectives. Computer software has come a long ways since Sargon for the PC. Rybka and Houdini are both exceedingly strong at all aspects of the game. For club players, not much of this matters. For the pros, it does.
Theory behind fritz
Sort:
I guess fritz guy is more concerned about threats . Positional play as an human can defeat fritz.Even while it can mate in a few moves the guy is more concerned about the things what opponent can do. Lol...