This rating system is RIGGED!
Sort:
It is just so unfair . Chess.com won’t know I made a blunder. It is just an game. It is just so sad to get back my rating. Any tips for getting more rating on rapid quickly?
AlvinYan424 wrote:
It is just so unfair . Chess.com won’t know I made a blunder. It is just an game. It is just so sad to get back my rating. Any tips for getting more rating on rapid quickly?
Here's a good tip: What about playing well?
AlvinYan424 wrote:
Yes I agree, chess rating is really unfair.I played a rapid and lost 500RATING FROM IT!And when I try to go back, 8 rating per win!?
That would be a provisional esc rating ....play more games and it will eventually be -8
Angry_Squidward wrote:
I disagree, when you're starting off, chess.com needs to be able to get your correct rating. If you usually play at 1500 ELO standard, and somehow lost against a 900, Chess.com isn't gonna know that you are a 1500 IRL, it just sees that you lost to a 900 and therefore you are worse than a 900, losing that amount of ELO points.... Simple Really, its just unfortunate
When you win more games your rating will go up one game even if it's provisional will get you back to your original elo pretty quickly if you play enough
I reported Levy
Jul 26, 2024
0
#66
@64 I know right...you can't just play two games and then think you have a rating... usually around 100 games is when your rating is balanced...
agreed, it's mega rigged
HangingPiecesChomper wrote:
agreed, it's mega rigged
Ur mom
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
HangingPiecesChomper wrote:
agreed, it's mega rigged
Ur mom
how does it feel to play 16k blitz games and be hard stuck 2200. with that many games I imagine I would be 2600 by now.
HangingPiecesChomper wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
HangingPiecesChomper wrote:
agreed, it's mega rigged
Ur mom
how does it feel to play 16k blitz games and be hard stuck 2200. with that many games I imagine I would be 2600 by now.
Ah but your not 2600 are you better luck next time 🤣🤣🤣
All I've been hearing from you are excuses tsk tsk
Besides it's not the amount of games that makes you better but 2200-2300 with the occasional tilt in playing for two years sounds pretty decent to me I dunno about you but your overestimating your intelligence
you peaked about 14000 games ago and you're not improving is why it's sad. 2200 is not a high level.
HangingPiecesChomper wrote:
you peaked about 14000 games ago and you're not Simproving is why it's sad. 2200 is not a high level.
Huh ? You think elo is the measure of improvement buddy ? Besides I haven't even done otb before lol besides I have gotten better if just been focusing on different things besides why do you care so much about my elo? You insecure buddy ?
dove-coves wrote:
Urmom
ur father