You can usually win the U1900 section and yet have a rating in the 1300s? Need to be more explicit for that to make any sense :)
Like anything you have to put in work over time to get good. A few years of work makes a respectable non-pro player. Even if you're still destroyed by B, A, or expert players, about 2 years of work at it should make a non-patzer out of anyone.
Disregarding of course that very strong pros may call less strong pros patzers or even amateurs :p
1300 to master depends on the individual and your environment. For example having access to strong tournaments, primarily for the experience of strong opposition. Empirically it's reasonable to assume no less than 2 years in all but the most exceptional cases. However if you're already approx. 1900 strength then in the right environment it could easily be less than a year.
In practice it's often much longer, and frankly in many cases never happens at all. Some primary factors are aptitude to work/learn and availability of adequately strong tournaments.
What you can count on is if you're willing to continually search for and eliminate your weaknesses, then you'll get there eventually. In the face of ever-increasing difficulty as their rating improves, most people become content with their skill long before master level and stop improving.
Master is a great goal though, lots of luck!
Hi all,
I am a 15 year old chess player, and I have been playing for quite a while. I wanted to know what you guys considered a good rating (referring to USCF) and what you guys think is a good rating (on chess.com). I also wanted to know how long it would take approximately to get to a National Master level from a 1344 rating. (That means that I will need to gain 856 rating points). I am interested in what you all think. By the way, my rating of 1344 is a little low, considering the fact that I usually can win the U1900 section in tournaments.
Thanks for your help in advance,
Pawnpusher3 :)