To all our female community out there
Sort:
Ofgeniuskind_closed
Oct 29, 2017
0
#21
Or are you hottie?
Oct 29, 2017
0
#24
women prefer guys that have only two break ups. any less and you're inexperienced and more than that makes you a player lol
Afraidya-Gonalose wrote:
oregonpatzer wrote:
@AviaSharma: content deleted by CrystalMoon
Your rating is not so great, Oregonpatzer, and I don’t think patronising racism is funny.
Three points:
1. References to another country's indigenous zoology are no more racist than would be reciprocal references to the bears, cougars and raccoons I have seen on my own land. References to foreign economic events are no more racist than would be reciprocal references to American tax reform or Federal Reserve actions. Cultural references may be a closer case, but racism would require negative criticism or denigration.
2. The other user initiated an obscene attack against me, and as in real life, I do not feel bound to suffer it in silence, and depending on my disposition at the time, I reserve the option of responding in my own personal style.
3. You have correctly noted that my rating is "not so great", and I will note in turn that the maximum rating I have ever achieved on here (1435) is still higher than your 1417. Your taste in comedy is of no interest to me.
I hope this has cleared things up.
OGK did u report and deport yet
Oct 29, 2017
0
#30
Of course, that's why I've been losing so many games on this site. I thought these checkers were funny looking!
Not sure, if this is stereotypic, of most females ; But, it could be !?
Ships than pass in the night...
.. I can't 'light-a-candle', to "Casey Niestadt's," social-media, prominence ; But, posting a video of his, is Doable !
Oct 29, 2017
0
#35
Hot nice, kind, and loyal girls are hard to find. Hoes on the other hand...
Oct 29, 2017
0
#36
oregonpatzer wrote:
Afraidya-Gonalose wrote:
oregonpatzer wrote:
@AviaSharma: content deleted by CrystalMoon
Your rating is not so great, Oregonpatzer, and I don’t think patronising racism is funny.
Three points:
1. References to another country's indigenous zoology are no more racist than would be reciprocal references to the bears, cougars and raccoons I have seen on my own land. References to foreign economic events are no more racist than would be reciprocal references to American tax reform or Federal Reserve actions. Cultural references may be a closer case, but racism would require negative criticism or denigration.
2. The other user initiated an obscene attack against me, and as in real life, I do not feel bound to suffer it in silence, and depending on my disposition at the time, I reserve the option of responding in my own personal style.
3. You have correctly noted that my rating is "not so great", and I will note in turn that the maximum rating I have ever achieved on here (1435) is still higher than your 1417. Your taste in comedy is of no interest to me.
I hope this has cleared things up.
It was blatant sexism and racism. Please note your warning from Chrystal Moon.
Incase you missed it -
Chess.com neither wants nor allows racism in the forums. More postings of this sort will have consequences. -CrystalMoon
I would hope that was clear enough for you.
Afraidya-Gonalose wrote:
oregonpatzer wrote:
Afraidya-Gonalose wrote:
oregonpatzer wrote:
@AviaSharma: content deleted by CrystalMoon
Your rating is not so great, Oregonpatzer, and I don’t think patronising racism is funny.
Three points:
1. References to another country's indigenous zoology are no more racist than would be reciprocal references to the bears, cougars and raccoons I have seen on my own land. References to foreign economic events are no more racist than would be reciprocal references to American tax reform or Federal Reserve actions. Cultural references may be a closer case, but racism would require negative criticism or denigration.
2. The other user initiated an obscene attack against me, and as in real life, I do not feel bound to suffer it in silence, and depending on my disposition at the time, I reserve the option of responding in my own personal style.
3. You have correctly noted that my rating is "not so great", and I will note in turn that the maximum rating I have ever achieved on here (1435) is still higher than your 1417. Your taste in comedy is of no interest to me.
I hope this has cleared things up.
It was blatant sexism and racism. Please note your warning from Chrystal Moon.
Incase you missed it -
Chess.com neither wants nor allows racism in the forums. More postings of this sort will have consequences. -CrystalMoon
I would hope that was clear enough for you.
My new book "So you thought I cared!" will be available in stores in time for Christmas. Of particular interest to you might be chapter four "Dealing with your personal problem by yourself", chapter seven "Does Jesus love you: an epistemological refutation" and chapter twelve "How adding me to your life insurance actually makes you safer". If you catch my upcoming tour, I will sign a first edition for you if you ask nicely and I'm in a good mood.
Oct 29, 2017
0
#38
Ooh look I'm so intellectual see I used the word "Epistemology" see?
"Epistemology" is six syllables. Can you express the same concept in less than that?