Told you that Carlsen would do absolutely nothing to popularize chess.

Sort:
knightspawn5
913Glorax12 wrote:
knightspawn5 wrote:
913Glorax12 wrote:

People just like to complain. Chess is doing fine, it is shown in movies,shows, books and other entertaiment fields.

So has war, pestilence, diseases, disasters, they are doing well also.  The list just goes on and on.....lololol

Don't act stupid

What you pointed out were problems, Chess is a game. A game that is not dead as it still shown in the entertainment field

Why not you just did, now don't act stupid, just because they show it in the entertainment field doesnt mean that every bodys gonna line up and play it.  Even though it's not dead, it doesnt have the appeal that other games do.  It has no action like most video games, takes concentrtion, study if you want to be good at it, and time to study moves that are made.  It's not even close to being in the top 100 games to play.  Video, pc games, android or phone games are being played more than most any others in the world.  Yes, it's a great game, just not popular as most chess players like to think it should be.   

913Glorax12
knightspawn5 wrote:
913Glorax12 wrote:
knightspawn5 wrote:
913Glorax12 wrote:

People just like to complain. Chess is doing fine, it is shown in movies,shows, books and other entertaiment fields.

So has war, pestilence, diseases, disasters, they are doing well also.  The list just goes on and on.....lololol

Don't act stupid

What you pointed out were problems, Chess is a game. A game that is not dead as it still shown in the entertainment field

Why not you just did, now don't act stupid, just because they show it in the entertainment field doesnt mean that every bodys gonna line up and play it.  Even though it's not dead, it doesnt have the appeal that other games do.  It has no action like most video games, takes concentrtion, study if you want to be good at it, and time to study moves that are made.  It's not even close to being in the top 100 games to play.  Video, pc games, android or phone games are being played more than most any others in the world.  Yes, it's a great game, just not popular as most chess players like to think it should be.   

You seem to believe I think Chess is the most popular game ever. I don't which you can tell by what I saying "Chess is doing fine". Meaning it isn't a dieing game.

johnmusacha

Thanks everyone for the responses.

In response to Mersaphe:  Kasparov had a lot of media coverage well before this Deep Blue matches.

He was on American network TV quite regularly in the 1980's, before your time brah . . . he was on David Letterman and Johnny Carson pretty much regularly.

Not as regularly as Joan Embry from the San Diego Zoo though.

johnmusacha

Sorry I said regularly three times in two sentences but I am a bit "under the weather" he he he he.

Iluvsmetuna

That's ok Johnny brah.

johnmusacha

Oh yeah brah.

In response to those that will say, Carlsen was on The Report Colbert, yeah, I saw that segment . . .

Jadulla

How can you say that after the success of the app Play Magnus?

yucca

Can I just say that some trolls aren't doing enough to popularise trolling?

CJ_P

The kid could have 20 more year on his career and peeps already saying he'll do nothing. That's like saying when Kobe and Shaq were fighting that Kobe would never draw fans.

TitanCG

Why are chessplayers like Carlsen always asked about promoting chess but athletes like Blake Griffin, Peyton Manning, Richard Hamilton, Christiano Ronaldo and others aren't asked to promote their sport? It's like the former is being asked to do more than compete while the others aren't. 

CJ_P

Because they're not asked, they're expected too.

TitanCG wrote:

Why are chessplayers like Carlsen always asked about promoting chess but athletes like Blake Griffin, Peyton Manning, Richard Hamilton, Christiano Ronaldo and others aren't asked to promote their sport? It's like the former is being asked to do more than compete while the others aren't. 

TitanCG
CJ_P wrote:

Because they're not asked, they're expected too.

TitanCG wrote:

Why are chessplayers like Carlsen always asked about promoting chess but athletes like Blake Griffin, Peyton Manning, Richard Hamilton, Christiano Ronaldo and others aren't asked to promote their sport? It's like the former is being asked to do more than compete while the others aren't. 

I assumed they only did commercials for their sponsors.

Jenium
johnmusacha wrote:

Thanks everyone for the responses.

In response to Mersaphe:  Kasparov had a lot of media coverage well before this Deep Blue matches.

He was on American network TV quite regularly in the 1980's, before your time brah . . . he was on David Letterman and Johnny Carson pretty much regularly.

Not as regularly as Joan Embry from the San Diego Zoo though.

Kasparov was/is always pretty busy promoting himself...

knightspawn5

No, Joan was on there with all kinds of animals....  lol I remember that one little one peed on his head....lol

TheGreatOogieBoogie

I think the USCF has the correct idea, just the wrong implementation.  They're heavily promoting scholastic chess but then they seem to stop caring when those kids grow up.  To attend chess events (especially FIDE rated ones) people must travel and at great expense.  This by far and away is the biggest turnoff for me at least. 

To popularize chess more at least start by serving those already playing and instead of (or better, in addition to) big expensive tournaments with $350 entry fees (on top of room, board, and gas) there would be more smaller tournaments that are accessible to more people.  Even better if they have FIDE oversight (as terrible as that organization is, even Andre Schulz in Chessbase magazine mentioned how ludicrously corrupt FIDE is.)

  To quote Schulz from Chessbase magazine #151:

“In the 2010 elections there was a dual attack by Karpov/Kasparov.  Some federations have taken up their position early on and openly supported the two of them in the candidature of Karpov, including a complaint against FIDE in the International Court of Arbitration for Sport in Lausanne.  It concerned the formulation of the statues of FIDE and the legality of the candidature of Ilyumzhinov. This legal attack was so obviously violent that FIDE went over the top by spending a heap of money on lawyers and reports, amost (sic) a million Euros.  FIDE did win the case but remained stuck with the greater part of the costs which it had itself generated. “

He then went on to write about how the FIDE presidential board came out against the nations who filed the lawsuit, such as the USA, France, Germany, Switzerland, the Ukraine, Georgia, and the UK. 

Then he mentions how FIDE has an inappropriate balance of power, as for example four player federations have the same voting power as major federations such as Russia and England, and how mini-federations are abused to tip the scale in incumbents’’ favors.  Then mentions how major federations should get more involved in FIDE’s work.  

 

Ambassador_Spock
SmyslovFan wrote:

Somebody once said that football (soccer) is hard to play but easy to understand while chess is easy to play and hard to understand.

It is a well-known Vulcan proverb.