Sometimes someone asks a question and I respond even if it might be off topic.
But, of course, I already proved chess is a win for Black with best play.
Maybe you've proven it to yourself, but I don't see that you've offered your proof here.
Chess is a win for black with best play from both sides. Here is the proof:
It turned out Chess is a Zwischzwenzwuang!!!!!
it's a draw only because the board defines the math as finite
My "proof" that chess is a win for Black is really only evidence and should be taken with a grain of salt. [or may be with a whole salt shaker]
My "proof" that chess is a win for Black is really only evidence and should be taken with a grain of salt. [or may be with a whole salt shaker]
I don't have a salt shaker in my house. We use grinders filled with sea salt and Himalayan salt. Sometimes we use a pinch of alder smoked sea salt, which is terrific on grilled salmon.
In any case, disputing your metaphor is not contesting your meaning.
Can you post the evidence so that I can reach for my salts?
In the 7th USA Correspondence Chess Championship Finals I won 7 out of 7 with Black. In the recent Ponz says he can refute the Ponziani out of 7 centaur games I played Black all 7 games and won 5 and drew two. Obviously the reason I did not win the 7 out of 7 was because I made errors in two games.
This "evidence" worse than what happened to Lot's wife.
[I am just saying looking at "evidence" per anedotal is not really seeking truth--we need stats and actual long term records]
In the 7th USA Correspondence Chess Championship Finals I won 7 out of 7 with Black. In the recent Ponz says he can refute the Ponziani out of 7 centaur games I played Black all 7 games and won 5 and drew two. Obviously the reason I did not win the 7 out of 7 was because I made errors in two games.
This "evidence" worse than what happened to Lot's wife.
[I am just saying looking at "evidence" per anedotal is not really seeking truth--we need stats and actual long term records]
I saw that. I want to see the games.
Just Saturday morning, some guy was telling me about some volcano that rained fire on Sodom and Gomorrah. He didn't say anything about the salt, however. He also had some wacky ideas about the French colonizing North American before Jesus was born.
So, did Lot's wife turn in to Himalayan salt?
Expertise87 vs ponz111 0-1
May I ask something ? Who is actually believing that Ponz111 means what he says ? Have you all not read his serious remarks aiming to show that chess is a draw ?
Ponz11 reminds me of a Quentin Tarantino now. Making a parody about all of us (about himself perhaps, too, and relaxing from the tiresome discussion).
I will believe it absolutely after I analyze the games.
So, did Lot's wife turn in to Himalayan salt?
Hmmm? That would be a miracle!
Here is 2nd game Expertise87 vs ponz111 1/2-1/2
FM JMB1020 vs ponz111 0-1
FM Bluebird1964 vs ponz111
FM Bluebird1964 vs ponz111 0-1
This game slightly different
Mainland_Novelty vs ponz111 0-1
Do you really want/need to see the 7 games I won with Black in the Finals of the 7th USA Correspondence Championship? Most are posted per my blog/Profile.
The game of chess is likely a draw. But the stronger player will typically win.
That's all @Ponz111 has been saying for 2000 posts in this thread.
Nontheless, there has been massive blather about tablebases, mathematical solutions to the game of chess, and other such will-o-the-wisps.
Just to sum up. Saves you lots of reading.
But don't look back and read those posts, or you'll turn into a salt mound. 
I just dropped in to let you all know I will not be participating in this thread.