True or False Chess is a Draw with Best Play from Both Sides

You didn't request that we identify the mistakes in a game, you asked that we identify a game with no mistakes, a very different challenge.

No, I'm sure that any game you present will be analysed by others and they will point out the fatal flaws for you if you can't.

There are drawn games that didn't have any mistakes. Find a decisive one with no mistakes. 

As far as I know, such a game does not exist.

We are talking past each other.

My point is that you cannot prove that this statement is true.

Even with all the engine assistance in the world....

The database, as EoJ1 indicated, seems to show that for standard opening moves, White is more likely to win.  Bobby Fisher said that he thought it was easier to get a win while playing Black.  That being said, Chess has not yet been "solved", like checkers has, so we can't say for certain whether white or black is more likely to win or whether a draw is most likely.

And you are showing a lack of chess understanding. 

Find a decisive game where YOU think no mistake was made. Someone here will prove you wrong.

It's not a lack of chess understanding at all, it's a simple question of game theory and tree complexity and an understanding of what a "proof" actually is.

The proof is in the game. Show us an example that makes you think chess is not a draw with best play.

We can say for certain that a draw is most likely, we can't say for certain that a draw is certain, despite the attempts by some here to do so.

I believe chess is a draw with best play.

The fact that a hundred million games have been played and not one person can show us a game where one side won without a mistake being made is very good proof. 

I'm not asking for a final proof. Just some EVIDENCE that chess is not a draw.

One game would be evidence.

This demonstrates a clear lack of understanding of what a proof is.

And people say I'm argumentative! You're just being contrary for the sake of it then.

You're not listening very well.

I believe chess is a draw with best play.

What I take exception with are the claims that this is known.

Neither Ponz nor myself nor anyone else that I've seen has stated that chess has been proven to be a draw. 

You're taking exception to mirages that you created.

Are you serious!?  Ponz just said it in post 1991... on this very page!

Those arguing that chess is not a draw have the burden of proof. A single example of a decisive game without any errors from either side would be EVIDENCE that their position is tenable. Otherwise, they have no evidence for their position. 

I'm not talking about a final mathematical proof, but just enough evidence to make their position tenable. So far, such evidence has not been produced.