So it's point #2 you don't grasp then.
confirmed idiot or troll
Just for fun, estimate the total computing power of all the computers on earth and generously assuming a billion positions per second for the equivalent of a personal computer what kind of time span would be required to solve chess?
A) About the lifespan of a person
B) Estimated lifetime of humanity (past up to now)
C) Estimated lifetime of the earth (past up to now)
D) Estimated lifetime of the galaxy (past up to now)
E) Much longer than estimated age of the universe
The answer may surprise you!
Why would we want to solve something when we already know the answer?
Indeed, a perfectly played game, however construed, will end in a draw. And that's the "personal prejudice" of most GMs as well.
That's an entirely plausible assertion. Proofs (however construed), notwithstanding.
Yawn.
Yes, while many here take liberties with the defintion of "proof" or "solution" Ponz111 prefers to take liberties with the definition of "knowledge".