Upvotes / Downvotes on Chess.com

Sort:
Avatar of IMKeto
EscherehcsE wrote:

From a practical perspective, I don't like this new upvote/downvote system. The upvote/downvote icons clutter up the area around the quote icon, and it takes me a fraction of a second longer to click on the quote icon. Over time, these added tenths of seconds will rob me of minutes of my life. ;-)

I gave you a "thumbs up" and voted your post down.  Why?  because i can :-)

Have a Merry Christmas E if i don't see you online before then.

Avatar of EscherehcsE
IMKeto wrote:
EscherehcsE wrote:

From a practical perspective, I don't like this new upvote/downvote system. The upvote/downvote icons clutter up the area around the quote icon, and it takes me a fraction of a second longer to click on the quote icon. Over time, these added tenths of seconds will rob me of minutes of my life. ;-)

I gave you a "thumbs up" and voted your post down.  Why?  because i can :-)

Have a Merry Christmas E if i don't see you online before then.

A proactive Merry Christmas to you too!

Avatar of IMKeto
EscherehcsE wrote:
IMKeto wrote:
EscherehcsE wrote:

From a practical perspective, I don't like this new upvote/downvote system. The upvote/downvote icons clutter up the area around the quote icon, and it takes me a fraction of a second longer to click on the quote icon. Over time, these added tenths of seconds will rob me of minutes of my life. ;-)

I gave you a "thumbs up" and voted your post down.  Why?  because i can :-)

Have a Merry Christmas E if i don't see you online before then.

A proactive Merry Christmas to you too!

And may everyday be a keto day!

Avatar of assassin3752

chess.com really needs to stop focusing on the social part of it and start focusing on the chess part of it

they should start by not removing live, whos with me

Avatar of Ian_Rastall

My guess is they'll ditch the emojis. The big difference between the two -- other than aesthetics -- is that the emojis aren't anonymous. That's pretty much required. You can't know who put in a negative vote or things get resentful.

But seriously, if you want a place that doesn't seem overrun, encourage others to indicate how they feel about it without joining the fray. Or maybe see it as a way of replacing the emojis, rather than adding on to them -- which would seem pretty redundant.

Avatar of IMKeto
assassin3752 wrote:

chess.com really needs to stop focusing on the social part of it and start focusing on the chess part of it

they should start by not removing live, whos with me

Awards...badges...icons....emojis...CAPs score..."brilliant" moves...up votes...down votes...

Rewarding people for doing nothing more than clicking a button.  Welcome to the internet.

Avatar of nTzT

I don't really mind the up/down votes but the interface is starting to get a bit cluttered. Perhaps they should hide the arrows until you hover over the message.

Avatar of keep1teasy
llama47 wrote:

This is why I left reddit. When a horde of players rated 800 downvote you because they don't understand your post.

I know it's appealing to businesses because of its addictive quality (when your post get 1 upvote it's a little dopamine) but from a human being's perspective this sort of thing is pretty annoying.

Either have reactions or upvotes and downvotes. Not both. This is overkill.

Avatar of keep1teasy
assassin3752 wrote:

chess.com really needs to stop focusing on the social part of it and start focusing on the chess part of it

they should start by not removing live, whos with me

Remove play, not live.

Avatar of batgirl
IMKeto wrote:
assassin3752 wrote:

chess.com really needs to stop focusing on the social part of it and start focusing on the chess part of it

they should start by not removing live, whos with me

Awards...badges...icons....emojis...CAPs score..."brilliant" moves...up votes...down votes...

Rewarding people for doing nothing more than clicking a button.  Welcome to the internet.

Welcome to the further proliferation of social media mindlessness.  It has less to do with the internet itself than it does with using the internet to manipulate people.  

Avatar of keep1teasy
little_guinea_pig wrote:
B1ZMARK wrote:
assassin3752 wrote:

chess.com really needs to stop focusing on the social part of it and start focusing on the chess part of it

they should start by not removing live, whos with me

Remove play, not live.

no u, I like play. Also I think they're doing it because under the old system daily and live each needed their own server, but play can fit both into one.

As long as play works just like live I won’t have a problem with it, but right now it feels too… absent. Like they dumbed down the interface. 

Avatar of nTzT
B1ZMARK wrote:
assassin3752 wrote:

chess.com really needs to stop focusing on the social part of it and start focusing on the chess part of it

they should start by not removing live, whos with me

Remove play, not live.

I prefer play. The live one makes the pieces look weird. It looks like it's using some old flash type interface I don't know why it blurs the pieces slightly, regardless of browser.

Avatar of IMKeto
batgirl wrote:
IMKeto wrote:
assassin3752 wrote:

chess.com really needs to stop focusing on the social part of it and start focusing on the chess part of it

they should start by not removing live, whos with me

Awards...badges...icons....emojis...CAPs score..."brilliant" moves...up votes...down votes...

Rewarding people for doing nothing more than clicking a button.  Welcome to the internet.

Welcome to the further proliferation of social media mindlessness.  It has less to do with the internet itself than it does with using the internet to manipulate people.  

It scares me that we cater to the lowest common denominator.  But i guess its easier to do that then to make people actually think. 

Avatar of Martin_Stahl
assassin3752 wrote:

chess.com really needs to stop focusing on the social part of it and start focusing on the chess part of it

they should start by not removing live, whos with me

 

The site started as a social chess site.

Avatar of batgirl
IMKeto wrote:
batgirl wrote:
IMKeto wrote:
assassin3752 wrote:

chess.com really needs to stop focusing on the social part of it and start focusing on the chess part of it

they should start by not removing live, whos with me

Awards...badges...icons....emojis...CAPs score..."brilliant" moves...up votes...down votes...

Rewarding people for doing nothing more than clicking a button.  Welcome to the internet.

Welcome to the further proliferation of social media mindlessness.  It has less to do with the internet itself than it does with using the internet to manipulate people.  

It scares me that we cater to the lowest common denominator.  But i guess its easier to do that then to make people actually think. 

Easier and more profitable.... it's a total win for chess. com.... for the members, it's a draw at best.

Avatar of assassin3752

imo play just isn't for me

I like live much better

too bad we only have a few more days left until they officially remove live sad.png

 

Avatar of nTzT

Have they stated the reason for removing it? Good thing I prefer play. I can't stand how live looks ;/

Avatar of EscherehcsE
B1ZMARK wrote:
llama47 wrote:

This is why I left reddit. When a horde of players rated 800 downvote you because they don't understand your post.

I know it's appealing to businesses because of its addictive quality (when your post get 1 upvote it's a little dopamine) but from a human being's perspective this sort of thing is pretty annoying.

Either have reactions or upvotes and downvotes. Not both. This is overkill.

I have a great idea - They could let us upvote/downvote the reactions... :-)

Avatar of Martin_Stahl
nTzT wrote:

Have they stated the reason for removing it? Good thing I prefer play. I can't stand how live looks ;/

 

They're not going to keep two interfaces and update both. New updates and features are only going into the Play interface. Also, I'm pretty sure the site has updates coming that will require the old interface to be retired (or require coding both for those updates and they're not going to double the work and testing).

Avatar of Chr0mePl8edSt0vePipe
#61

I guess that was a bad word choice. What I was trying to say was if a community doesn’t like your post what’s the point of posting. Just go to a different forum where your post will be “understood”. I know I didn’t have to explain that to you @batgirl. Notice how you delete the rest of my post in your response because that’s where I clarify what I mean.