Very weak rhetorical question.
In this thread at least @Ian_Rastall and @Chr0mePl8edSt0vePipe expressed they pleasure and made cogent arguments why they are happy changes.
Maybe you should re-read the thread from the beginning?
You mean this BS argument?
I think it’s a good feature. Responding to the OP: I think the argument against downvotes is faulty. If your post gets downvotes then it deserves downvotes.
Lmfao. People never upvote well-written, thoughtful posts that have a lot of effort put into it, especially with the majority of the people on the forums being kids ( who should be on Chesskids ). If I write something and someone responds with "ratio" then they will get more upvotes because kids find that crap funny.
If you say something that many people disagree with, no matter how logical it is, you get downvoted. If you criticise a post, the OP will downvote you. It is totally incorrect to assume that if you get downvotes, you deserve downvotes.
Good, but now follow it up by not whining like a child on the forums.
How about you $tfu because no one cares about your opinion?
I can tell you are a kid because you clearly think that people shouldn't give constructive feedback. A lot of people here have been pointing out site problems for a while. We are trying to make the site better by giving complaints
But of course since youre a kid, you love stupid features like upvotes, flairs, reactions, etc and since the UI changes have been catered to kids, I bet you love that too...
I do not mind constructive feedback, but you have only been whining like a baby. Look at your comments. You didn't say why play was worse or anything instead you just act like an immature child. No one cares mate, if you don't like it here... leave? Just don't whine non-stop.
Earlier in this or another topic I asked why play was worse and you just keep going on like an entitled brat instead of giving a mature, constructive criticism.