Use this test to get an estimate of your Elo rating !

Sort:
Avatar of ESP-918

edited moderator Andrewsmith 

Avatar of Optimissed

I tried it. It came out a bit low. Only used five mins on all of them together though.

Avatar of ESP-918
Optimissed wrote:

I tried it. It came out a bit low. Only used five mins on all of them together though.

Well at least you are honest , that's a good thing.

What rating did you get tho? 

Avatar of Optimissed

I think it was 1858.

Avatar of Optimissed

I expected it to be a bit over 1900. But I don't do any of the Chess.com tactics. I don't really like tests like these because they probably just compare your move with a move played in a game between masters and mark you down even if you make a perfectly reasonable move.

Avatar of Laskersnephew

Why not play real OTB chess (after the corona virus fades) and get a real ELO rating?

Avatar of llamonade2

Jesus that thing is old. I remember taking it almost 15 years ago.

And it's been posted 100 times to these forums already. I'm surprised some long term members here seem to be finding it for the first time.

It's not a good test. IIRC choosing various game-losing sacrifices in #9 will earn you the most points while choosing the engine-best move (or safe alternatives) awards you no points.

And #2 is a position from a famous game.

Anyway, like I said, it's super old. These days there are better ways to find out what your rating is. Here, let me give you a link:

https://www.chess.com/live

 

Avatar of llamonade2
Optimissed wrote:

I expected it to be a bit over 1900. But I don't do any of the Chess.com tactics. I don't really like tests like these because they probably just compare your move with a move played in a game between masters and mark you down even if you make a perfectly reasonable move.

I haven't tested every puzzle, but at least in some of them there are many different moves that earn you points.

Avatar of Optimissed

There seemed to me to be a fairly obvious move for each position but on one of them, for instance, only if you understand KID, which was to swap off the g7 bishop if I remember right.

I'm thinking of coming back to competitive chess this year. I've been absent for three years and my grade (rating) will disappear soon.

EDIT .... just checked, now I have an estimated grade and it's the ecf equivalent of 1800. I'm playing much stronger than that, I should have thought.

Avatar of llamonade2

And I knew Be4 for position 2 because it's a famous game, not because I would have found it myself.

Actually it's pretty instructive. A common KIA situation, using the loose dark squares to infiltrate and attack light squares. That sort of thing.

 

 

Avatar of llamonade2

If black takes the bishop the e3 knight is coming into the attack.

If black doesn't take the bishop then the bishop is in the attack.

The idea is simple, all that's left is some calculation.

Avatar of Optimissed

It is a simple idea because taking the B is obviously lost. Unfortunately I didn't get that one because I was very tired when I did the test. Don't put yourself down, because it was a shot to nothing, so you might have found it.

Avatar of ESP-918

This is not post in analysis section!  Thank you.

Avatar of SwollenWrist

I dont understand, i did this one and got 1740. and i also did the "elometer" one and got a similar result, almost 1800, but im pretty new to chess i dont think this is right

Avatar of andri10243

do not understand

 

Avatar of goodbye27

my estimated elo: 1575

Avatar of hakujin77

My "estimated" rating was 1830... Don't know what is possible there... It doesn't tell me which ones I got "right" and which ones I get "wrong"...

Avatar of Moonwarrior_1
llamonade2 wrote:

And I knew Be4 for position 2 because it's a famous game, not because I would have found it myself.

Actually it's pretty instructive. A common KIA situation, using the loose dark squares to infiltrate and attack light squares. That sort of thing.

 

 

Very instructive I personally didn’t find that one.

Avatar of tonyfresco

I got a 1730

Avatar of Nomophobiax
llamonade2 wrote:

And I knew Be4 for position 2 because it's a famous game, not because I would have found it myself.

Actually it's pretty instructive. A common KIA situation, using the loose dark squares to infiltrate and attack light squares. That sort of thing.

 

 

Wow this is a masterpiece by Fischer (maybe all his games are masterpieces?). A pity I didn't know (or find) Be4. I thought for just a minute on all the positions and what I calculated here was 28.Bxd5 exd5 29.Nf5 gxf5 30.gxf5 etc. Didn't calculate any further but thought that it should be a win for white.  

Am I wrong? Please help. And by the way I got a rating of 1960 (don't know if this is high or low).