Is there any way to delete thread ??? i think this thread is useless as he wasn't cheating at all
Was this guy cheating???
Sort:
0
#23
steal_yo_girl wrote:
Do you really think that ? My another account has 950 blitz rating , this account was in my dads phone and wasn't used for months
As a rule of thumb, it's not possible to recognize the playing strength of people + or - 400 points from your rating.
So for example, a grandmaster rated 2600 can't tell the difference between 1500 and 2000, it looks equally crappy 
And players like you and me can't tell the difference between an IM and someone like Carlsen. It all looks equally perfect.
So yeah, some people assume if you have a 3 digit rating you must be so bad you don't know how all the pieces move. Then they see development, castling, basic tactics, openings, etc, and it's really surprising to them.
0
#24
steal_yo_girl wrote:
Is there any way to delete thread ??? i think this thread is useless as he wasn't cheating at all
AFAIK only mods can delete topics, sorry.
Because you asked though, they probably will. Might take a few hours before one of them sees it though.
0
#26
Postafi wrote:
Aside from the usual hysteria about cheating, how is your game a Budapest? Looks like a plain Indian.
yeah it was indian game , i just played that move to look cool. I didn't knew its name. i just assumed
0
#27
ilovesmetuna wrote:
asking if a guy is cheating is fine, its just a yes/no answer, its not like you were going to rugby-tackle him, no need to delete the thread. you can always change the title to something like "why do women make so many blunders ?" and keep the chit-chat lively.
Hahahaha good one... I'll try to change this title
0
#28
steal_yo_girl wrote:
blitzcopter wrote:
A 600 cheating, that's cute
Thats not cute at all... he was the reason why i wasn't in top 3...
A computer analysis finds he made 4 blunders to your 6. And that was the reason you were not in the top 3.
You say he played fast, that is usually an indication that they are not cheating. To be cheating one would have to look at moves the computer suggests and then play them, which takes not too long, but still long to not warrant your statement - "When i played with him he was playing really fast".
JayeshSinhaChess wrote:
You say he played fast, that is usually an indication that they are not cheating. To be cheating one would have to look at moves the computer suggests and then play them, which takes not too long, but still long to not warrant your statement - "When i played with him he was playing really fast".
People use scripts to cheat.
Do you really think that ? My another account has 950 blitz rating , this account was in my dads phone and wasn't used for months