WCC location is unfair to Caruana

Please sir, we burned effigies of her to mark her passing!

Now you know and I know that the the FSB takes a very dim view of traitors and has in the past taken care of these treacherous sons on British soil.  However in this instance we have so far received zero evidence that the Russkies actually did it.  I am not saying that they never, simply that the British have not proffered any corroborating or substantiating evidence.  Its the same with the entire Russia gate narrative there is not a shred of credible evidence that the Russkies did anything that they stand accused of.  The NSA's evidence of hacking consisted of a list of IP addresses which could have been anyone three of which were Russian and on Russian public networks.  It fully deserved to be mocked.

Robbie is WOKE!

nah no woking, I said too much already

Do you still remember how we killed that bastard with plutonium? Laughed my booty off when they told me it actually worked.

And you should know what evidence they have, seeing how you’re definitely an insider, right? 

 And by the way, that’s not even all the evidence that public.  We have all kinds of records and email traffic, among other things between Russian agents and US officials. This is just one example and it’s the tip of the iceberg, just of what is public. 

https://www.justice.gov/file/1007346/download

a. Defendant PAPADOPOULOS claimed that his interactions with an overseas professor, who defendant PAPADOPOULOS understood to have substantial connections to Russian government officials, occurred before defendant PAPADOPOULOS became a foreign policy adviser to the Campaign. Defendant PAPADOPOULOS acknowledged that the professor had told him about the Russians possessing "dirt" on then-candidate Hillary Clinton in the form of"thousands of emails," but stated multiple times that he learned that
information prior to joining the Campaign. In truth and in fact, however, defendant PAPADOPOULOS learned he would be an advisor to the Campaign in early March, and met the
professor on or about March 14, 2016; the professor only took interest in defendant PAPADOPOULOS because of his status with the Campaign; and the professor told defendant PAPADOPOULOS about the "thousands of emails" on or about April 26, 2016, when defendant PAPADOPOULOS had been a foreign policy adviser to the Campaign for over a month.

_____________

This is a signned confession of what was admitted to by just one of the people who have been indicted (so far). 

April was long before even the public knew about the hacks.  The entire US intelligence community says the Russians did it, Russian agents were telling US persons they did it even before the public knew, but yet somehow you pretend to disbelieve it. 

I can go on posting email exchanges between Russian agents and other US persons, between WikiLeaks and others, between Guccifer2.0 and a US person, and more.  But I already know that there’s literally nothing I can show you that will make you admit you’re wrong. Because you’re not really interested in what’s true. 

Please I am not used to such churlish language, but yes, a most unsavoury affair, you slipped it into his drink I believe.  The problem of course was that the substance was so radioactive that it left traces everywhere your agents strayed, including hotels rooms in Germany. Sigh what was wrong with a good old ice axe in the ear?

Too churlish.

More nothingness and unworthy of serious comment.  The entire narrative is a complete and utter FAIL. 

Wikileaks has publicly stated categorically that the DNC was compromised by a party insider. The forensic evidence of the compromised material also shows that it was downloaded from the DNC server using a high speed thumb drive, not through the wire.  Furthermore Vault Seven in the Wikileaks files (which if you have ever read it) has proof that the NSA engineered software to mimic foreign intelligence hacking.  What narrative are you going to peddle to combat these incontrovertible and inconvenient forensic truths? Some fantasy about Facebook swinging the election with a few well placed advertisements? You deserve to be mocked for your willfull ignorance and inability to differentiate between fact and fantasy.

You also seem to be harbouring the delusion that what your spy agencies say is congruous with the known facts.  Hilarious.  Remember WMD anyone? The fabricated dossier? US intelligence? Mork calling Orson, come in Orson.

agreed, those Russky boors!

 Absolutely. Russian agents telling US persons they have the stolen emails before even the public knew about the hack is a big nothing burger. 

As I said, I fully expected you to deny it literally no matter what. 👍

 Some people just have no integrity. I blame it on bad parenting. 

I find it quite funny to see everyone complaining about Russian interference as if most nations didn't try to exert their influence when there is an election somewhere.

But I think the belief that some Facebook ads changed the result of an election is laughable at best. It's a good story for the press though.

Forensic evidence nil. Parents, sure why not, you have blamed it on the Russians and everything else.  Anything to keep reality from making inroads.

Is that all it was was just some Facebook ads,  or are you being obtuse to right now?  

Actually no, transcripts of communications are forensic evidence.  And also you have no idea the totality of the evidence. We only know what’s public, and you don’t seem to know very much. 

 So when the Russians told certain US persons they had hacked DNC emails (before the public knew) and offered to use them to help sway the election, they were lying? 

Right, the Russians said that despite the fact that the forensic evidence proves that it was leaked rather than hacked and despite the publisher of the material (wikileaks) stating that it was leaked rather than hacked.   Please my time is too precious to waste on your failed narrative, seriously.

You were telling us about the forensic evidence seeing that you know so much. . oh wait that was me, you were telling us some old wives tale about he said this and she said that.

I at least examined the NSA evidence for their hacking claims, I at least read the wikileaks files, I at least read the report on the forensic evidence stating that the speed of the download was too high for a wire and more likely to have been a USB device.  I am not entirely sure what cornflakes packet your narrative comes from. Weiners laptop perhaps? the WoPo? Oh dear.

its your narratives claim.  Can you tell us how many facebook drones were influenced?