Royalty shouldn't be so foolish.
WE HATE CHESS.COM NOT ALLOWING US TO VIEW CONTENT WITHOUT PAYING!!!

I think chess.com has the right to put in content which requires a membership to view... It allows funding for awesome events like titled tuesday and chess mentor activities created by GMs.

Although i do admit it gets annoying how little we can see of videos as free members, there are plenty of other sites on chess videos and they don't owe us the full videos (they did make them afterall).
Everybody, you know that the majority of people will never pay. It's useless to try to make them pay and frankly, it's quite annoying, not being able to watch some videos, the lesson limits, and more.

Sure, everybody agrees with that. I'm not going to pay and I'd like some of the premium benefits. But why do you think chess.com should have to give you anything free? They're giving you quite a lot already with a place to play unlimited chess, and most of us think you should appreciate that rather than demanding more.
can people delete some unrelated comments by the way because it's difficult to read all these comments
Dude do you really think people are going to do this for free. Besides they hive a place to play chess. Be more appreciative.
Actually the answer to your question is yes. People will do this for free. Unfortunately I can't give you an example because that's not allowed here, and I already got in trouble for it.
The idea, which I like, is everything on the internet should be free, excellent, with no ads. Not just chess but everything else.
Dude do you really think people are going to do this for free. Besides they hive a place to play chess. Be more appreciative.
Actually the answer to your question is yes. People will do this for free. Unfortunately I can't give you an example because that's not allowed here, and I already got in trouble for it.
The idea, which I like, is everything on the internet should be free, excellent, with no ads. Not just chess but everything else.
The OP should change the title to "I..." instead of "We...". People might think that there really are many members demanding free access to everything.