What accuracy % do you consider a “good” game?

@powerpunch 107

We’ve been over this, you won your game very quickly, and your opponent blundered a lot 

You didn’t work for it it was a walkover

I would say around 80 percent would be good.

@Schnarchnase44 you don’t need 85% accuracy for your rating 70% would already be considered very good

 Are you some kinda ratting wizard or something ?

is 94,5 good for an 880 in a 17 move game?

that's a GM average but in a match is okay to have that accuracy , if you keep it with that elo, in 9 games your account gonna get banned 100%

( accuracy% vs rating# ) is NOT one of the criteria the Cheat Detection Team uses for detecting cheaters. At most, it might draw their attemtion to a particular account. By itself and uncorroborated, it would NEVER trigger a ban.

 Ofc don't but u can't have low ratting having over 90 accuracy in the most of your matches, believe me 

Just understand it's completely a relative stat. How many moves are in the game? What was the accuracy of your opponent? A beginner's high accuracy is not comparable to any other higher level.

I don't care about it

If your opponent doesn't resign you can rack up 20 good moves in a row in an endgame when you push a pawn and chase their king. Also sticking to a b grade plan that you actually understand and gets you a winning advantage is better than playing above your skill level and losing to a line that might be better but is too complicated for your current ability.  If you care about winning  that is

Any game you win is a good game.

Anything above 90 is reasonably good, but the games that bring me satisfaction are more often complex blunderfests where my creativity and persistence paid off.