Pathetic. When i was 400 i got a 97 accuracy game
What accuracy % do you consider a “good” game?
Sort:
Feb 6, 2023
0
#183
There could be random times when you suddenly got a accuracy of above 95. This doesn't mean engine cheating level however, just that either that's your real skill anyway, or you did extremely well! In my oppinion 98-100 would be a red flag for cheating, but not 100% yes either.
Anyways, for me, a basically 1600s player in stuff,
Anything lower than 50 is bad. Really bad.
50-60 is also really bad.
60-70 would be my occasional accuracy if I had a really tough game that went everywhere but my way.
70-80 would be okay... More tilted to the bad side, but acceptable.
80-90 would be what I get most of the time. This is my expected range.
90-95 would be a pretty decent game for me!
95-97 woah, that would be one of the best games.
97-100 Yeah, no. Unless we played some lines where everything was forced and I won, this isn't quite possible for me. 97 seems more reasonable, but anything above that is just a no. Too good lol, even top players would struggle getting that
blueemu wrote:
Chess.com's accuracy stat has no bearing on whether I would consider a game "good" or not.
A game is "good" if it's a real struggle, a battle of chess ideas.
A walkover might be entertaining, but only rarely would such a one-sided game be "good".
very relatable unless you actually played like garbage, like missed wins or misses lmao
Viznik wrote:
What accuracy percentage do you consider makes a “good” game for you?
70%? 80% 90%?
I’d say for me, anything over 80% leaves me feeling pretty good about my play.
70%? 80% 90%?
I’d say for me, anything over 80% leaves me feeling pretty good about my play.
10%
Feb 6, 2023
0
#186
Depends how strong your opponent is, sometimes is just way to obvious what you need to do 
I would say 80-90% is decent enough to be considered a good chess player that is above average
75% or more
Feb 8, 2023
0
#190
We’ve been over this, you won your game very quickly, and your opponent blundered a lot
Viznik wrote:
What accuracy percentage do you consider makes a “good” game for you?
70%? 80% 90%?
I’d say for me, anything over 80% leaves me feeling pretty good about my play.
70%? 80% 90%?
I’d say for me, anything over 80% leaves me feeling pretty good about my play.
I would say around 80 percent would be good.
around 85%
Feb 10, 2023
0
#194
@Schnarchnase44 you don’t need 85% accuracy for your rating 70% would already be considered very good
BUCKLEYNYC wrote:
@Schnarchnase44 you don’t need 85% accuracy for your rating 70% would already be considered very good
Are you some kinda ratting wizard or something ?
is 94,5 good for an 880 in a 17 move game?
azertyarno wrote:
is 94,5 good for an 880 in a 17 move game?
that's a GM average but in a match is okay to have that accuracy , if you keep it with that elo, in 9 games your account gonna get banned 100%
Feb 17, 2023
0
#198
w24ha wrote:
azertyarno wrote:
is 94,5 good for an 880 in a 17 move game?
that's a GM average but in a match is okay to have that accuracy , if you keep it with that elo, in 9 games your account gonna get banned 100%
( accuracy% vs rating# ) is NOT one of the criteria the Cheat Detection Team uses for detecting cheaters. At most, it might draw their attemtion to a particular account. By itself and uncorroborated, it would NEVER trigger a ban.
Anything above 90%.
Below that, I feel disappointed in my play.
well here I was feeling great about my 83% accuracy game
here i am thinking my 55% accuracy as 400 rated was good, now im sad