What accuracy % do you consider a “good” game?

Sort:
powerpunch107

Pathetic. When i was 400 i got a 97 accuracy game 

LAS_776

There could be random times when you suddenly got a accuracy of above 95. This doesn't mean engine cheating level however, just that either that's your real skill anyway, or you did extremely well! In my oppinion 98-100 would be a red flag for cheating, but not 100% yes either.
Anyways, for me, a basically 1600s player in stuff,

Anything lower than 50 is bad. Really bad.

50-60 is also really bad.

60-70 would be my occasional accuracy if I had a really tough game that went everywhere but my way.

70-80 would be okay... More tilted to the bad side, but acceptable.

80-90 would be what I get most of the time. This is my expected range.

90-95 would be a pretty decent game for me!

95-97 woah, that would be one of the best games. 

97-100 Yeah, no. Unless we played some lines where everything was forced and I won, this isn't quite possible for me. 97 seems more reasonable, but anything above that is just a no. Too good lol, even top players would struggle getting that

LuvHaise
blueemu wrote:

Chess.com's accuracy stat has no bearing on whether I would consider a game "good" or not.

A game is "good" if it's a real struggle, a battle of chess ideas.

A walkover might be entertaining, but only rarely would such a one-sided game be "good".

very relatable unless you actually played like garbage, like missed wins or misses lmao

theinvesto
Viznik wrote:
What accuracy percentage do you consider makes a “good” game for you?

70%? 80% 90%?

I’d say for me, anything over 80% leaves me feeling pretty good about my play.

10%

OwnkruidBE

Depends how strong your opponent is, sometimes is just way to obvious what you need to do happy.png

I would say 80-90% is decent enough to be considered a good chess player that is above average 

Doris-M-Dog

I got 90% the other day, was a real tail wagging event!

 

amazinggoalkeeper
75% or more
BUCKLEYNYC

@powerpunch 107

BUCKLEYNYC

We’ve been over this, you won your game very quickly, and your opponent blundered a lot 

BUCKLEYNYC

You didn’t work for it it was a walkover

MarioParty4
Viznik wrote:
What accuracy percentage do you consider makes a “good” game for you?

70%? 80% 90%?

I’d say for me, anything over 80% leaves me feeling pretty good about my play.

I would say around 80 percent would be good.

Schnarchnase44
around 85%
BUCKLEYNYC

@Schnarchnase44 you don’t need 85% accuracy for your rating 70% would already be considered very good

w24ha
BUCKLEYNYC wrote:

@Schnarchnase44 you don’t need 85% accuracy for your rating 70% would already be considered very good

 Are you some kinda ratting wizard or something ?

azertyarno

is 94,5 good for an 880 in a 17 move game?

w24ha
azertyarno wrote:

is 94,5 good for an 880 in a 17 move game?

 

that's a GM average but in a match is okay to have that accuracy , if you keep it with that elo, in 9 games your account gonna get banned 100%

blueemu
w24ha wrote:
azertyarno wrote:

is 94,5 good for an 880 in a 17 move game?

 

that's a GM average but in a match is okay to have that accuracy , if you keep it with that elo, in 9 games your account gonna get banned 100%

( accuracy% vs rating# ) is NOT one of the criteria the Cheat Detection Team uses for detecting cheaters. At most, it might draw their attemtion to a particular account. By itself and uncorroborated, it would NEVER trigger a ban.

Anonymous27165
85+ for me
fit
m
TandemTCG
I don't really care about accuracy. I look at the number of blunders I made to evaluate if I consider my game good or not.

If I had to give a number, though, I'd say 75% is good for me.
This forum topic has been locked