What accuracy % do you consider a “good” game?

Sort:
Avatar of HeyMan_341

last game i got 100 accrocy so that was nice

 

Avatar of Chan_Fry

I consider a game "good" if (a) I enjoyed it, (b) won decisively, and/or (c) learned something. Sometimes all three of those happen in a game and the accuracy is 60% or lower. Sometimes none of those three happen and my accuracy is around 90%. In other words, accuracy is irrelevant to whether a game is "good". (For me, at least.) Good is a very subjective term.

Avatar of NikkiLikeChikki

It's not just in winning situations where accuracy doesn't tell the whole story, but also sometimes in losing position. As a human, when you're down, often what you want to do is make it hard for your opponent to find moves by complicating the position. Stockfish can easily cut through a complicated board, but humans find this more difficult. Stockfish would say that your moves are inaccurate, or possibly even losing, but against humans it's often best to make the position hard to calculate to give yourself practical chances.

Avatar of pfren
ISaidIWasOP wrote:

last game i got 100 accrocy so that was nice

 

 

Great. You should have earned a spellchecker as trophy.

Avatar of JTorreslolz

A solid 82% is my minimum where I feel relatively pleased 

Avatar of Euchrid_Eucrow

of course i like a high accuracy score.... but sometimes when i simplify chess.com thinks it was inaccurate.  i am playing to my level. i am not Magnus. i will take the advantage where i know i can win even if it overlooks some fancy nancy line where i would fkk it up half way throug  that  line,  when winning ... keep it simple... dont be greedy,,, back in your end game.  anyway, what would i know?

Avatar of Mathieu9229

It depends on the game length and complexity but I would say over 85% in blitz or 90% in daily. 

Avatar of SuperJasonSuper

For me (1300), for rapid games, I think 60%- is really bad, 60-70% is bad, 70-80% is ok, 80-90% is decent, 90%+, 0 blunders (at least obvious ones) and missed wins, and minimal mistakes is optimal.

Avatar of begsdeniki

Blitz: 80-90%, 90+ seems unreal for such low rating, like my oponent gave up on life. I don't think even high ratings play ultra accurate, its blitz, ye?

Avatar of Fisikhad
I consider 84%+ accuracy a good game
Avatar of silicon4oxide

Sometimes when I premove too much and get tricked into blundering stuff but still win or draw, those are also good games

Avatar of ShadowCellen

Above 90% accuracy 

Avatar of ShadowCellen

In rapid though

Avatar of TheNinja_1234
A-A-RonTBF wrote:

I am a 773 rated player right now and I just got a 88.9% accuratecy game and was wondering if that's good for my elo?

I am a 553 rated player and I got 85.3%. Is it good at this level??

Avatar of A-A-RonTBF

yeah 93 is great

Avatar of ShadowCellen
A-A-RonTBF wrote:

yeah 93 is great

He said “good” not great

Avatar of A-A-RonTBF

for a 500 rated played 93% is great

 

Avatar of ShadowCellen
A-A-RonTBF wrote:

for a 500 rated played 93% is great

 

Yeah

Avatar of Kowarenai

it depends but tbh its just a game so for me i dont really fidget too much on weird numbers

Avatar of ShadowCellen

Weird … Weird….weird….

This forum topic has been locked