What an attack! Beating a 2000 with complications…

Sort:
Avatar of DoYouLikeCurry
chesssblackbelt wrote:

Idk Nc4 offended me on a spiritual level. He really saw Kg1 and just thought you were shuffling your king for no reason lol. And there's a discovery check as well. Kg8 is so natural

It was certainly a surprising move. I guess he evaluated that neither the discovery or the knight check was dangerous. Boy, was he wrong haha

Avatar of Pudding
chesssblackbelt wrote:

that g4 move in a bullet match is a !! instead of a ? lol

Erm actually it's annotated as ?! not ?

Avatar of DoYouLikeCurry
Just_an_average_player136 wrote:
chesssblackbelt wrote:

that g4 move in a bullet match is a !! instead of a ? lol

Erm actually it's annotated as ?! not ?

tbf - the distinction between mistake and inaccuracy is so arbitrary that they might as well be equivalent terms in most cases…

Avatar of chesssblackbelt

I just call everything a blunder 😂

Avatar of JatinStrikes

Yeah I have seen players considering an inaccuracy as a blunder or mistake as a blunder, especially titled players as an inaccuracy turns the whole game ,

Avatar of IronInitiative

👍

Avatar of DoYouLikeCurry
JatinStrikes wrote:

Yeah I have seen players considering an inaccuracy as a blunder or mistake as a blunder, especially titled players as an inaccuracy turns the whole game ,

That’s the weird thing about inaccuracies - sometimes they do genuinely alter the course of the game, sometimes they are essentially “good” move equivalents

Avatar of wehsing22
Avatar of theserpentile53
Cool
Avatar of DoYouLikeCurry
qu1nnkr4m3r wrote:
Cool

Cheers happy.png