It's great.
What do you think of the computer analysis feature of chess.com right after each game.
Sort:
Yeah I think so too.
I hate it, not only I have to lose to those patzers, but also cope with the computer saying « one player was winning, then blundered»
I use it after every game, to check my mistakes.
It seems to me that the post-game computer analysis isn't correct every time...
Sometimes computer's advices are strange... and even wrong... I can give examples taken from my games.
Nov 6, 2018
0
#9
I think it’s mocking me. I only win because my opponent blundered. Kind of sobering and humbling. I wish it would shut up.
Nov 6, 2018
0
#10
pdve wrote:
What do you think of the computer analysis feature of chess.com right after each game.
I think it's pointless and dumb.
If I want to analyze something I'll load up the latest version of stockfish in chessbase, not some browser engine that analyzes each move a fraction of a second. I play better chess than that stupid thing can analyze.
---
Oh, but from a business perspective it makes sense. If it helps attract and maintain more users... that's all they care about (and all they should care about).
For people who actually care about improvement though, UCIs are free and the best engines are free, so figure that shit out for yourself.
pdve wrote:
It's a great feature. Very few players have the patience to download the pgn feed it into chessbase or scid and then go through the game with an engine. It's better to have the program do an analysis just on the click of a button.
Are you talking about the blunders/mistakes/ missed wins table and one sentence analysis that pops up automatically? Or the fuller quick or deep analysis that is available after the game?
I think most people here (#6,#8,#10,#11,#12,#13) think you mean the former.
It's a great feature. Very few players have the patience to download the pgn feed it into chessbase or scid and then go through the game with an engine. It's better to have the program do an analysis just on the click of a button.