What if a girl became World Chess Champion?

Sort:
batgirl

Uncle Fred!

badger_song

My buddy!

odisea777
JamieDelarosa wrote:
Elubas wrote:
JamieDelarosa wrote:
Elubas wrote:

"You know absolutely nothing about the development of homo sapien if you think men are bigger and stronger so they could hunt for food and water."

Geez, I would have thought that would be a halfway decent guess? lol

Sexual dimorphism in humans stems from Australopithacine ancestors,

Yeah, I don't know what those are.

Men were bigger and stronger so they could make women mate with them. Otherwise the species would have died out; the men had no money back then

badger_song

Thats an interesting premise,rape is the result of natural selection and a favorable inherited behavioral trait.

_Number_6
WorldChessNews wrote:

The Main Reason a Female will Never become World Chess Champion is because they lack the “Killer Instinct” Inherent in Males!

 

Prior to the FIDE WC cycle, there was really no such thing as a professional chess players and the WC's by and large came from academia.  Up unti '72 the only players who could reasonably make a decent living were the Soviets and the Soviet School dominated high level chess.  Had the Soviet School promoted women chess players as much as men there would be more high level female players everywhere.  It is telling that no women achieved GM prior to the colapse of the Soviet Union.  Judit Polgar certainly proves it is possible to be a contender.

batgirl
_Number_6 wrote:
.

Prior to the FIDE WC cycle, there was really no such thing as a professional chess players and the WC's by and large came from academia. 

What's your basis for that contention?

Akatsuki64

Iff a girl became wcc:

Akatsuki64

http://www.sopitas.com/site/252304-jackie-chan-descubre-que-es-un-meme/

odisea777
badger_song wrote:

Thats an interesting premise,rape is the result of natural selection and a favorable inherited behavioral trait.

Yeah well, rape, murder, theft - they hadn't thought of these things at the time. To busy trying to survive. No time for ethics until survival wasn't the only issue

badger_song

not even wrong

odisea777
badger_song wrote:

not even wrong

nope. just reality.

bigpoison

Nope. Males use their size and strength to dominate lesser males rather than the females. This is elementary stuff.

odisea777

so there was no physical coercion used in mating? The men wined and dined and seduced the women? 

bigpoison

Your hatred of women pollutes your thinking.

wu1010
[COMMENT DELETED]
Elubas

I should be just as famous as Carlsen, because the only reason I'm not as good as him is because I just didn't feel like putting in the time. 

I don't know, I just think sometimes when people are too excuse happy it can devalue people's accomplishments. It's much easier to say you could have done something than to do it.

And at the same time it's not fair to assume you're amazing because you're good at an esoteric activity, because it may just be a sign of your obsessiveness.

JamieDelarosa

Oh Lord!  What a testosterone-fueled mess this has turned into.

If you want to know what primative human and homonid behavior was like, consider the bonobos (pygmy chimpanzee).

badger_song

Jamie,it's the corrupting influence of The Ring of Trolling,some of the posters here are trapped in it's clutches;unable to break free they are forced to type irrational and nonsensical opinions.When confronted,they have no choice but to double-down and dig an even deeper hole for themselves ,then screaming,leap into the darkness.Such is the vile power of The Ring of Trolling.....

TheGrobe

The idea that males have really ever held any material amount of influence over mating decisions is laughable at best, fearfully misogynistic at worst, especially when physical dominance is evoked as the rationale.

badger_song

So your time machine actually works?