BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Cirrin wrote:
Although, from my perspective
A 2000 rating is a beginner level, a terrible level, many others this level probably think the same
The main reason is because, once you reach this level, you realize you are a beginner in the world of expert and master level players
Nevertheless, I think 1800+ bullet is a good rating overall because IMO, that's when bullet chess starts to become more quality and a more about playing decent chess than the clock (mostly based off of my own experience
Nah 2000s can beat 2600s that is not begginer level
Actually 2600 isn't really good either, since I reached it I've only been tilting and am currently only at 2450.
With bullet it often depends on the circumstances.
Although, from my perspective
A 2000 rating is a beginner level, a terrible level, many others this level probably think the same
The main reason is because, once you reach this level, you realize you are a beginner in the world of expert and master level players
Nevertheless, I think 1800+ bullet is a good rating overall because IMO, that's when bullet chess starts to become more quality and a more about playing decent chess than the clock (mostly based off of my own experience
The statements contradict each other. Nevertheless, you are somehow right.