what is a good chess rating?

Sort:
roniron

Thanks for your insight. I really want to stop playing as I don't want to devote my time to it (leave it to professionals). Yours and comments from other high rated players do help me. It is hard to stop though, it is like mental masturbation - useless but fun activity that requires no effort to get things done.

BronsteinPawn
roniron escribió:

Thanks for your insight. I really want to stop playing as I don't want to devote my time to it (leave it to professionals). Yours and comments from other high rated players do help me. It is hard to stop though, it is like mental masturbation - useless but fun activity that requires no effort to get things done.

null

WeakChessPlayedSlow
roniron wrote:

Thanks for your insight. I really want to stop playing as I don't want to devote my time to it (leave it to professionals). Yours and comments from other high rated players do help me. It is hard to stop though, it is like mental masturbation - useless but fun activity that requires no effort to get things done.

I wish chess was like mental masturbation, at least...

BronsteinPawn

null

roniron

LOL thanks guys, make my day wink.png.

BronsteinPawn

null

U_Got_Crushed
Category Rating range
Grandmaster 2600 and up
Senior master 2400–2599
Master 2200–2399
Expert 2000–2199
Class A 1800–1999
Class B 1600–1799
Class C under 1600

this is the chess chart i am under 1600

U_Got_Crushed

if you are a grandmaster say it!!!

 

U_Got_Crushed

in the coments pls 

 

U_Got_Crushed

 pls

 

uhidkwutisthisbai

class c

uhidkwutisthisbai

yep my rating weird but class c

i didnt earn this rating

stephenhession

I just started and have been smoked in the first three games I've played. What is the best path for rapid improvement ?

ThichNhatHahn

The game is infinite. Rarely does anyone, likely even Magnus Carlson, believe he is "good" enough. And how does one even define "good?" 

ThichNhatHahn

If one wishes to improve, they must study the game which includes tactics, strategy, openings, middle and end games. And analyzing ones mistakes, along with master games is quite helpful. Would also recommend a coach. Chess.com has been a wonderful site for me. 

french
bluejibb wrote:

maybe you understand that chess is a waste of time and they should have done something else more enjoyable with their lives

I resent that

 

thejoker9000

Is this still valid considering you used to start at around 1200 (correct me if I'm wrong) and now you start at around 700. Seems a lot harder to climb that way?

kp-aust
thejoker9000 wrote:

Is this still valid considering you used to start at around 1200 (correct me if I'm wrong) and now you start at around 700. Seems a lot harder to climb that way?

If you mean for this site, then yes it is valid.

I started on here in October 2020 and now have an 1800 rating. But I have played for a few years. When I was younger I looked up to the guys who had 1600's, 1700's and 1800's ratings and thought they were gods on the threshold of chess greatness. As you climb you realise that is not the case. The real gods don't play in the sand pit.

I now look at the guys in the 2000's and think how awesome it would be if I somehow got to that level of chess awareness. Maybe someday I will get a coach (I have never had one), and maybe one day I will study games, but I am way too old to ever be good. 

sleazymate
I think the biggest problem is that people want to superficially speed run to the desired rating rather than building strong understanding at each step. It seems to me that rating is vacuous in itself the only benefit it allows you is to hopefully play more interesting players that will stretch you. But with this new chess paradigm , people are learning superficial concepts to play ‘gentlemen chess player’.
Pilot_Xtreme

there is no "good rating", as everybody of course wishes to be higher rated, but i think a reasonable one would be 1800