What is Consider a Good Chess Rating on this Site?

0/10 ragebait

Speaking facts isnt ragebait. If somebody is offended by this perhaps they should learn to chomp on hanging pieces to 2400.

it's ragebait if you tell an exaggerated vision that no one agrees with.

How come i got 2400 on this site so easily then

ragebait is decided by others, not by you or your rating.

Rage bait has to be false, not just some people getting offended. If somebody said 100s suck at chess and offended 100s, is it ragebait?

Yes, because you are probably trying to get posts

I'm 1000 elo (was, just lost a lot) in bullet, but just because you're so good at chess, doesn't mean you have to throw smack at people who are bad at chess. Unlike them, they don't make ragebait content. So try harder next time 0/10.

Just because you guys are offended by everything doesnt make everything ragebait

The average elo is roughly 700-800 so id say to be considered good 900-1000 elo

average is 600 lol

"Good" is very subjective. Look at the percentiles.

Surely if you're making the top 10% you could call yourself a decent player?

Having said that I can make top 5% rapid here but struggle to make top 25% Lichess classical, much stronger and smaller pool.

say what

Agc

are you a chess master?

*future master

I just beat Wallace the mammoth. He's 2000 so I must be good eh??

no, cuz I beat Magnus bot

Just look at the percentile, 40-60 -average

61-75 your above average so good

76-85 - very good

86-95 excellent

above 95 - magnificent!!!

no not really.