What is KID?

Sort:
Avatar of SivasankaranAK

Can someone tell me what is the KID

Avatar of SolSurvivorOP

KID is the abbreviation of King's Indian Defence. One of the most popular chess opening arising from 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 Bg7.

Avatar of corny

Ypu

Avatar of corny

Your favourite Opening?*

Avatar of borovicka75
Yea, kings indian is passive and losing, that´s why Kasparov was worst player ever.
Avatar of km_DDQ
No it’s one of greatest defense against d4
Avatar of borovicka75
Your coutryman probably never saw Kasparov games - his fault
Avatar of tygxc

Kasparov gave up on the KIng's Indian Defense after this loss.
https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1070932 
It is rather dubious:
https://www.iccf.com/game?id=1164279

https://www.iccf.com/game?id=948179

https://www.iccf.com/game?id=948250

'King's Indian defense is riskier for black than King's Gambit for white' - Bronstein.
Fischer did not dare to play it against Botvinnik.

Avatar of Mazetoskylo

The KID is a great and very ambitious opening, but at the same time extremely complex positionally, and depressively theory-heavy.

Avatar of svens1234

i did not know that ;-;wink

Avatar of SivasankaranAK
hkbusowkgpa4 wrote:
SivasankaranAK wrote:

Can someone tell me what is the KID

A passive and losing opening

The best defense is attack, if you play KID opening, then you will be under pressure and need to wait for counterattack or the opponent to blunder.

I always tell the opponent that bishop is used for attack but not defense, putting the bishop in second rank in the opening is completely useless. Bro this is the god opening I won 16 times in a row

Avatar of SivasankaranAK

This is godly

Avatar of SivasankaranAK

yes may be u are right

Avatar of SivasankaranAK

they too weak

Avatar of SivasankaranAK
AZPawnstar wrote:
hkbusowkgpa4 wrote:
SivasankaranAK wrote:

Can someone tell me what is the KID

A passive and losing opening

The best defense is attack, if you play KID opening, then you will be under pressure and need to wait for counterattack or the opponent to blunder.

I always tell the opponent that bishop is used for attack but not defense, putting the bishop in second rank in the opening is completely useless.

Bobby Fischer disagrees with you.

or does he who is bobby fisher is he a fisherman?

Avatar of Rayfamily
SivasankaranAK wrote:

Can someone tell me what is the KID

your mom jkjk

kings indian defense

Avatar of blueemu
tygxc wrote:

Fischer did not dare to play it against Botvinnik.

Fischer's decision to play the Gruenfeld instead of the KID against Botvinnik in that 1962 Varna Olympiad match had nothing to do with the KID's soundness. Fischer simply didn't play openings that he considered unsound. The KID was part of Fischer's regular repertoire, therefore he considered it a sound opening.

... and the decision certainly had nothing to do with a game played 35 years later.

Fischer played the Gruenfeld against Botvinnik because he tended to reserve the Gruenfeld for his attempts at "Game of the Century". Witness his game against Byrne, six years earlier.

Avatar of tygxc

@20

'I could see by the glint in his eye that he had come well armed for my King's Indian' - Fischer

Fischer avoided the King's Indian Defense altogether in the 1972 World Championship Match against Spassky.

Avatar of SivasankaranAK

how long did it take for u write that

Avatar of borovicka75
The fact that Kings indian is not common amongst 2700+ players does not mean that it is whatever bad for club player. I use to play otb blitz every friday with my friend. I am e4 player but i play d4 against him because he allways plays KID and every single our game is very exciting and funny.