You can't help being a liar, even though I explained exactly what I did. I think I scored 169 at least three or four times. I never took the test when I was feeling in great shape, because I was recovering from hepatitis and had been in a coma when I had it. I took the test when I was very tired, when I had a bad cold, first thing in the morning when I'd slept badly etc. My object was to discover the spread of results that were genuinely possible even if a person was trying his hardest. I scored twice less than 135 and most of my results were in the 150s and 160s.
But although it has been explained clearly to you, you try always to present those you feel threatened by in a poor light. However, if you believe you're telling the truth then your memory is worse than failing. Otherwise, you're a liar: your choice. I know I have a better memory than either of you and I can recall a conversation with Ziryab from before his memory started to fail. It isn't important and I'm pointing it out for the record.
There's no lie in what you have recounted here. My narrative matches yours, actually. You just don't like that people reach different conclusions from the same data sets offered.
. 
In your opinion, what do you think is the likelyhood of him sockpuppetting? It seems the forum is in agreement that he is rotating between accounts.
You are just instigating, as always, from the sidelines. Any "likelyhoods" (sic) in terms of sockpuppetry are bound to be in your favor, this being at least the 3rd username you've run around on.