What is the avg. IQ of players on chess.com

Sort:
lamirrox99719

Guo Wengui lied to hundreds of thousands of his online followers, promising them huge profits if they invested in GTV Media Group, Himalayan Farm Alliance, G| Club and Himalayan Exchange. Since at least March 2018,

lamirrox99719

Guo Wengui has been the mastermind behind the complex financial scam, in which he and his financial adviser Kin Ming Je defrauded thousands of people and made more than $1 billion.

PromisingPawns

Mine's probably 20 lol am dumb af

magipi
Duncan-Mcloud43 wrote:

Einstein had a iq of around 160....

Einstein most likely never took an IQ test. That number (160) is nothing else but an urban legend.

noodles2112

Mozart was a Superior Genius but no record of him playing much chess nor taking the Stanford-Binet IQ testwink.png

nik1111

Not less than 100, we are capable of registering ourselves first time, than logging in. Leaving comments, etc... below 100 person is not interested much in that. Average IQ should be calculated here from 100 as starting point.

noodles2112

what's interesting is that many who claim to have above average IQ's are still easily duped via illusions/deceptions.

nik1111

@noodles2112 pure psychology, as some girl who would constantly put repeating on how she is "dangerous" for the opposite sex...

noodles2112

referred to as Classical Conditioning

young old black white rich poor "intelligent" dumb etc.

does not discriminate.

N0S1GNAL
I hold the personal belief this community’s average IQ is the same as the average IQ of Japan.
noodles2112

Optimissed

Nasa

Ziryab
winsitall wrote:

Chess requires a lot of discipline that even a great genius may not muster without thorough training. As someone who has never played chess until I was 28, starting now has been a humbling experience. Besides being unable to tell if people are cheating, or not even realizing all of the rules of the game. Just learning from playing by trial and error. I have discovered a great deal. Including that it is evidently not even against the rules to look up starter positions and basically guarantee 100% starter accuracies. I'm not sure what that means overall to ratings and I have never played in a tournament over the board. I personally have no real interest, for me it is just a fun game. Nothing that competitive, ill likely never seek coaching. I have been tested and have a much higher than average IQ. Regardless I have not gotten past 1000 rating on chess.com. Granted apparently I didn't realize I could have started at 1200 and I chose 500. My score fluctuates quite a bit, and honestly the challenge of the game is interesting. I am in no way a chess master or prodigy. My greatest game was beating a 1700. I probably won't ever be a chess master. I can guarantee the amount of effort and games needed to reach that rating are not worth it for myself. Even winning all the games back to back 0 losses would just be too many games. I think of chess rating more like a high score on video games. I recognize the thinking ability involved, and I don't think advanced players are dumb at all. I just think of it like this. Someone else may even be a genius.. but if they never started playing until they were 40, and someone with a similar IQ as them started at age 5... they will likely never even come close and the player who started first could probably beat the other a majority of games for the rest of their lives. It is what it is, and playing chess has ultimately been a humbling experience. I guarantee that it is a specialized skillset however, and for 99% of people it should not ever be more than a hobby for fun time... it is in no way anything more than a waste of time basically. Just think about it... a genius could devote their entire lives perfecting this game to the point of obsession. A different genius could devote their lives to master something else like art. Sure the genius artist may be great at chess... but never perfect it. The same could be said of the chess player. Most genius chess players basically just play chess and rarely have anything else. The top players in the world survive from chess and play ruthlessly. By comparison everyone plays timid and lacks a complete understanding. It is a game with as many concepts and variables as life itself. More potential moves exist on the board then there are atoms in the solar system. I just play for self improvement now.

I ran this post through software that estimates IQ based on sentence structure. It came up with 90, just a little higher than an indicted politician who also claims a very high IQ. His chess rating is also close to yours.

AbyssalSludge

I suppose I'll take my first IQ test today. Should be funhappy.png

chessengeria

mee too happy.png

noodles2112

Optimissed - since the day of Nasa inception has been nothing but deceptions

Like I said, even those who claim to be "intelligent" fall for the deceptions Hook, Line & Sinker!

What does that say about ones "intelligence"?

mpaetz
noodles2112 wrote:

what's interesting is that many who claim to have above average IQ's are still easily duped via illusions/deceptions.

Many very intelligent people dupe themselves via their belief that they can understand things better than anyone else and dismissal of "inferior" contrary evidence.

noodles2112

in other words to "deify error" if error seduce them.

ostrichyyy
Tsi Sang Kai Poi
ostrichyyy
Mong kok
ostrichyyy
Wan chai