What is the point of 960??
@The_Chin_Of_Quinn
Yawn.
Bitch please, you must have a mental disease. Go back to your own topics where you can safely talk to yourself.
Just for the record.
UniversityOfPawns, this was my opinion of it instantly. It does place position evaluation and tactics at a higher level of importance but that's naturally what develops anyway once you get out of the opening. Maybe it's just my opinion because I seem to do well in the endgame scenarios naturally. When I lose a game it's generally because I flubbed the opening and got myself into a bad enough position right out of the gate that I have a hard time overcoming if I'm playing someone who is solid. Once we get into the middle game, as long as the position is somewhat balanced I usually hang in there right to the very end or outplay people in the endgame. So perhaps it's just my opinion based on what I need to improve but openings to me are where I need to improve so as to not set myself up to fail.
Its what Fischer came up with "Fischer random chess" Its supposed to remove Opening Theory form the game. I still dont understand that. Chess isnt even close to being solved, and acting like computers have ruined the game is ridiculous.
Its what Fischer came up with "Fischer random chess" Its supposed to remove Opening Theory form the game. I still dont understand that. Chess isnt even close to being solved, and acting like computers have ruined the game is ridiculous.
I couldn't agree more. Computers haven't ruined the game in my mind, they have only expanded on it. Computers have challenged us to think way outside the box on occasion to find either some success, or just salvage from a disadvantageous position. They have allowed one to also advance in chess on their own being self taught. Yes, people use them to cheat, but they only hurt themselves in the long run. They are essentially asking the computers for all the answers and not learning anything on their own while making the other person compete with a computer which will make them stronger for sure. I think running a game through an engine after you just lost is an amazing way to learn and get better. Especially when you don't have a GM looking over your shoulder to help you. I myself am more of a positional player than an aggressive player< so openings are important and you need to know them so you don't get your butt kicked just trying to get off the starting block.. And once you get into the middle game, tactics and positions can and will come from anywhere anyway so I just don't get it.. Opening theory isn't absolutely necessary, but it is fundamentally sound and a good idea..
The main reason why Chess960 was founded is that guys who founed this varation knew that in normal chess are known combinations by pc. They wanted to add this varation for fun.
Have a nice day!
piotrchess
Not always, sometimes you can start with all 16 pieces on the first two ranks just in different order. Speaking of which, I entered a tournament for this without realizing that it was 960, and also without realizing what 960 even was had I noticed. Is there a way to back out of the tournament? It's the first game and I have not made a move yet. Will it effect my rating for it if I do so?? Because I am of the mind that if it will cause me to have a loss, I may as well just play it out rather than take the loss for no reason.
StupidGM defending the indefensible narcissist game_designer...interesting. Wonder if their IPs match.
Not always, sometimes you can start with all 16 pieces on the first two ranks just in different order. Speaking of which, I entered a tournament for this without realizing that it was 960, and also without realizing what 960 even was had I noticed. Is there a way to back out of the tournament? It's the first game and I have not made a move yet. Will it effect my rating for it if I do so?? Because I am of the mind that if it will cause me to have a loss, I may as well just play it out rather than take the loss for no reason.
Pretty sure you're out of luck -- the way I understand it is that you can withdraw at anytime, but if the tournament has already started, your remaining games will be counted as loses and your rating will take a hit.
But even if I'm wrong, why not play?
Which is misguided because "natural talent" doesn't exist. Like any deep skill, the depth of the competition (and IMO satisfaction) comes from two players who have practiced a lot. You can see this in sport, art, science, anything.
Also some starting positions in 960 aren't equal. A better solution to place less emphasis on opening theory (although modern players already play tons of londons and d3 Ruys do this on their own) would be to select a small number of equal starting positions that a game could being from. Then from those few, either make the starting position random, or let the players agree on one of them.
DUDE. WTF. THAT WAS MY IDEA.
I thought about that a lot some time ago and I think it is a great idea.
.. If there's one common denominator, as it were ; Regardless, of what type of chess, is being played ; If, All other game factors, among both players, are equal ; The player, who 'tires' 1st, {usually, both mentally & physically}, is More likely to lose.
.. I was reminded of that, 15 minutes ago .. when I left a 'piece', 'en prise';
On the 19th move !
@The_Chin_Of_Quinn
Yawn.
Bitch please, you must have a mental disease. Go back to your own topics where you can safely talk to yourself.