what is the point of this gambit

Sort:
Avatar of shivank2005

but why he did not took the bishop 

Avatar of NuancedConfers
NuancedConfers wrote:

The above game can be found in both the chess.com and ChessBase databases. It's probably either a bizzare series of transcription errors or the players deciding to screw with everyone.

Avatar of shivank2005

dont focus on this forum because you know that this a blunderic game then why need to focus.

Avatar of TheBlunderfulPlayer

I guess the game was fixed. Patzers would never play like that, let alone two titled players.

Avatar of shivank2005

leave this forum

Avatar of TheBlunderfulPlayer
shivank2005 wrote:

leave this forum

Why?

Avatar of shivank2005

because you know that the game is full of blunders then what is the need

to stay on this forum

Avatar of NuancedConfers

And yet, you're still here...

Avatar of TheBlunderfulPlayer
NuancedConfers wrote:

And yet, you're still here...

Ouch!

Avatar of shivank2005

ok i am going

Avatar of PatZerblunder

Looks like one of my games where I can't see that the Queen is "en prise" for 7 moves...

Avatar of adumbrate

It was a positional game guys, don't worry about the queen !!!!! Cool

Avatar of adumbrate

1700's don't know positional stuff..

Avatar of BirdsDaWord

It's obviously a joke game.  

Avatar of shivank2005
Dr-Zaitzev wrote:
BirdBrain escribió:

It's obviously a joke game.  

No, it is not, but it was quite crazy, in fact.

 



hey we know that the game is of full blunder 

Avatar of BirdsDaWord

I think the point is that this might be a "real" game, but I can also post a real game with my 4-year old that has just as much merit.  This game might as well have been played by beginners.

It has no merit to be deemed a "real" game, because a "real" game is a game where two people are actually competing for the win.  This looks like a mockery.

Avatar of shivank2005

you are right but know one like gm and im would play like this

Avatar of shivank2005

sorry it is no

Avatar of pfren
Dr-Zaitzev wrote:
shivank2005 escribió:

yeah a stupid game

It is a very positional game, and it was played properly. Please, analyse it, with solid statements before giving adjectives.

Thanks.

It's a blitz game. If registered via a DGT board, then it's absolutely sure it's full of errors. Blundering stuff at random has nothing to do with "positional game", and I'm sure both Andreas and Ruck can play much better than that, even in blitz mode (unless they both drank generous quantities of tsikoudia before the game).

Avatar of shivank2005

yeah correct