chess.com-2145
lichess-over 2630 and top 50
Lichess around 1750 classical.
On this site there is no such category so the ratings mean absolutely nothing. "Rapid" could be anything from 10/0 to 60/0. Totally different disciplines.
800m runners don't compete against 10,000m athletes and comparing them is like measuring apples against oranges.
When I ran track in high school, I competed in everything from the 800 to the two mile. Of course, I was not near fast enough to be any good at the 800. Longer distances were my thing. At ten miles, I could hold my own with some of the top runners in my city, although they destroyed me in the two mile.
Can you all sub to this channel https://www.youtube.com/@BoxofwhineJR
Chesscom blitz: 1960 - Lichess blitz: 2065
Chesscom bullet: 1937 - Lichess bullet: 2150
Chesscom rapid: 1900 - Lichess rapid: 2318
(not playing on lichess regularly for a long time)
Almost 2000 here and about 2300 on lichess, and I believe as you go down the rating hill the differences get higher. So, yup, lichess has pretty inflated ratings in comparison to chess.com.
Chesscom blitz: 1960 - Lichess blitz: 2065
Chesscom bullet: 1937 - Lichess bullet: 2150
Chesscom rapid: 1900 - Lichess rapid: 2318
(not playing on lichess regularly for a long time)
1900 rapid chess.com vs 2300 rapid on Lichess is crazy. Are you sure your Lichess rating isn't provisional?
Never played on Lichess, but my chess.com rating is about 300 points higher than my old OTB rating from 25 years ago.