What is your favorite master or grandmaster game?

Sort:
fightingbob
Lasker1900 wrote:

Re: The game of the Century: The actual queen "sacrifice," 17...Be6! Was actually not that hard. If you gave that position to 20 masters who had never seen it before and asked them to pick the winning move for Black, I would bet that at least 17 of them would quickly find 17...Bx6. It's really an exchange of the queen for a lot of material and a hopelessly exposed white king.  The thing that is so impressive is the trmendous series of stong, sharp moves the 13-year old Fischer came up with after Byrne's careless 11.Bg5?

Very good points, Lasker1900, and it think you're absolutely correct.  I think Magnus Carlsen also revealed his precociousness when he drew Kasparov at the age of 13.  I got as kick out of this Youtube video.  Magnus even looks bored.  A real natural!

Best,
Bob

fightingbob
nimzo5 wrote:
A couple favorites

Karpov - Spassky 1974
Morphy - Knight

Thanks for the post, nimzo5.

I'll post both, but you have to be more specific about the Karpov vs Spassky game since there were 11 played in the 1974 Candidates Match with four wins for Karpov and one win for Spassky.

Best,
Bob

Robert_New_Alekhine

I can't select between so many great games...

fightingbob
YuriSenkevich wrote:

I like Fischer game in generals. Everytime I see a game I feel connected with him and usually learn something

Thanks for your post, YuriSenkevich.  There is something very direct, clean and overpowering about Fischer's games.  Some of them seem effortless, almost inevitable, which is a mark of genius no doubt.  A good example is Game 6 from the 1972 World Championship.  Game 10 also impressed me. 

Best,
Bob

fightingbob
Robert_New_Alekhine wrote:

I can't select between so many great games...

Yes, it's tough, Robert_New_Alekhine.  I only posted the games I did because they were the first one I was exposed to that made me take notice of chess as an art form and as a competitive struggle.

Best,
Bob

nimzo5

to OP: I think it was game 8 - Karpov plays 24. Nb1. Heavily anthologized, but still excellent.

fightingbob
nimzo5 wrote:

to OP: I think it was game 8 - Karpov plays 24. Nb1. Heavily anthologized, but still excellent.

You were close Nimzo5, it was Game 9, which came up first in a Google search of "Karpov - Spassky 1974."  I just wanted to make sure.

Here are the two games.

Best,
Bob




fightingbob
C-Crusher wrote:

Tigran Petrosian - Garry Kasparov (All games)

Thanks for the post, C-Crusher.

The magazine New in Chess dedicated an article to the first two games between Garry Kasparov and Tigran Petrosian that had been analyzed by Garry in his first lone analytical work published in the west, The Test of Time.  Actually, the magazine article was Jan Timman's review of the book with an emphasis on these two games, which obviously impressed Mr. Timman.  I've included both below.

I also found the game between Kasparov and Korchnoi from the 1982 Lucerne Olympiad worthy of inclusion as I was thumbing through the book for this entry.  Garry used eight pages to analyze it under the subheading When it is Chess that Wins.

Best,
Bob

AND





BISHOP_e3

Nakamura - Aronian
Chess960 Rapid World Championship Chess Classic Mainz 2009

 
1.f4 f5 2.Bd4 d6 3.Qg1 c5 4.Bc3 Nc7 5.g4 e6 6.d3 Bf7 7.e4 Ne7 8.Ne2 Qg8 9.Nb3 b6 10.0-0-0 g6 11.Nd2 0-0-0 12.Bh3 fxe4 13.Nxe4 Ned5 14.Bf6 Rd7 15.c4 Nb4 16.a3 Nc6 17.Bc3 Be7 18.g5 d5 19.Nf6 Bxf6 20.Bxf6 Qf8 21.Nc3 Qd6 22.Qf2 Kb7 23.Kb1 Rf8 24.cxd5 Nxd5 25.Nxd5 Qxd5 26.d4
 
The game continued 26...e5 27.Bxd7 Nxd4 28.Rxd4 cxd4 29.Rxe5 Qa2+ 30.Kc1 Qa1+ 31.Kc2 d3+ 32.Kxd3 Qd1+ 33.Qd2 Bc4+ 34.Ke3 Qg1+ 35.Kf3 h5 36.Re1 Qc5 37.Be7 Bd5+ 38.Kg3 h4+ 39.Kh3 1-0


fightingbob
YuriSenkevich wrote:
fightingbob wrote:
YuriSenkevich wrote:

I like Fischer game in generals. Everytime I see a game I feel connected with him and usually learn something

Thanks for your post, YuriSenkevich.  There is something very direct, clean and overpowering about Fischer's games.  Some of them seem effortless, almost inevitable, which is a mark of genius no doubt.  A good example is Game 6 from the 1972 World Championship.  Game 10 also impressed me. 

Best,
Bob

Here is a game I just casually discovered on his chessgames.com page:

Be4 was beatiful yet simple and it was amazing how he controlled all of his game, white rooks had nothing.

Thanks again for the post, YuriSenkevich.  I have never see this game before now, but Be4 is indeed simple and beautiful, and the game itself as unostentatious as a Haydn symphony.

Best,
Bob

fightingbob
BISHOP_e3 wrote:

Nakamura - Aronian
Chess960 Rapid World Championship Chess Classic Mainz 2009

1.f4 f5 2.Bd4 d6 3.Qg1 c5 4.Bc3 Nc7 5.g4 e6 6.d3 Bf7 7.e4 Ne7 8.Ne2 Qg8 9.Nb3 b6 10.0-0-0 g6 11.Nd2 0-0-0 12.Bh3 fxe4 13.Nxe4 Ned5 14.Bf6 Rd7 15.c4 Nb4 16.a3 Nc6 17.Bc3 Be7 18.g5 d5 19.Nf6 Bxf6 20.Bxf6 Qf8 21.Nc3 Qd6 22.Qf2 Kb7 23.Kb1 Rf8 24.cxd5 Nxd5 25.Nxd5 Qxd5 26.d4
The game continued 26...e5 27.Bxd7 Nxd4 28.Rxd4 cxd4 29.Rxe5 Qa2+ 30.Kc1 Qa1+ 31.Kc2 d3+ 32.Kxd3 Qd1+ 33.Qd2 Bc4+ 34.Ke3 Qg1+ 35.Kf3 h5 36.Re1 Qc5 37.Be7 Bd5+ 38.Kg3 h4+ 39.Kh3 1-0

Thank you for the post, BISHOP_e3.  I'm not usually a fan of Chess960, but this game appears interesting.  At least you don't have to worry about booking up on openings.  It will take top grandmasters to make Chess960 a viable alternative to traditional chess.

Best,
Bob

PawnPassant101

I don't know if anyone else has posted this game, but I love the Immortal Draw game. 

 

John Bartholomew's video about the game - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZ9iia2aIQc

fightingbob
alexm2310 wrote:

Very difficult to pick an absolute favourite, but if anything has to be it, here you go.

Better than playing through it here with my lazy annotations, Kavalek himself talks through the game here - http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lubomir-kavalek/the-world-chess-hall-of-f_b_1173754.html

Thanks for the post, alexm2310.

This is another game I haven't seen -- there are a lot of them -- and it is one for the record books.  I love the imbalance in material and the complete positional domination by Black with a lone bishop against two rooks.  In addition, pawn storms are always exciting unless you're on the receiving end; then they're terrifying.

Thanks for the link too, which has a PGN download near the end that includes annotations by Kavalek and Hübner plus comments by Gufeld.  Frankly, in the Chess.com player that PGN would have been really messy with all those variations, so I appreciate your comments and short annotations.

Best,
Bob

fightingbob
PawnPassant101 wrote:

I don't know if anyone else has posted this game, but I love the Immortal Draw game. 

John Bartholomew's video about the game - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZ9iia2aIQc

Thanks for your post and the YouTube link, PawnPassant101.  This is another game unfamiliar to me, but not anymore.  I was not familiar with Mr. Bartholomew either, but he provides an excellent overview of this unique and entertaining king hunt. 

I'm going to include the game below for others to play through, though they ought to catch Mr. Bartholomew's lesson in controlling squares and keeping the opponent's king hemmed in.

Best,
Bob



fightingbob
Klauer wrote:

It's the rook. Wilhelm Steinitz vs. Curt von Bardeleben

And here the queen sac. Adolf Anderssen vs. Jean Dufresne

Thanks for the post, Klauer.  A couple of games I am familiar with, and both excellent choices.  I'm particularly fond of the Steinitz - von Bardeleben game with the untouchable rook.  A wonderful aesthetic coup.

Best,
Bob

edguitarock
Thanks Bob for the link to that article. It is very interesting reading Fischer's take on the old masters. It is ironic that he liked 19th century players so much considering that these days everything is about computers, accurate analysis and play. Strange to think that arguably he became the best player ever without any of the advantages we have today.
fightingbob
edguitarock wrote:
Thanks Bob for the link to that article. It is very interesting reading Fischer's take on the old masters. It is ironic that he liked 19th century players so much considering that these days everything is about computers, accurate analysis and play. Strange to think that arguably he became the best player ever without any of the advantages we have today.

You're quite welcome, edguitarock.  What I particularly liked about Bobby Fischer was his appreciation for past masters, though he initially misjudged Emanuel Lasker but came around to appreciating his pragmatic, fighting style.  Fischer had a sense of history and chess culture that was admirable.

Simonpal19

One of Anand's best:

 

fightingbob
Simonpal19 wrote:

One of Anand's best:

Thanks for your choice, Simon.  Anand is one of the great players in history, but you'd never know it from the lack of ink he gets.  Though not as consistent as he was in his prime, he's still capable of some real beauties.  I'll have to check my old New in Chess magazines to see if I can find this game with annotations.

Best,
Bob

fischeriii

Fischer's game of the Century