What it's really like being a female chess player.

Sort:
Kem_Nebu

nice T-Rex

TRextastic

Radiovitch wrote:

saying ''some men in chess world arw more women than some women'' is because they can get angry for a nothing, I didn't mean to be sexist but this stereotype is kinda true, not totally but it happens often... I have just to look at my mom, my ex girlfriends or some of my chess club players.

Have you considered that they're not getting mad over nothing? Maybe you're just incapable of understanding why they're angry. If you want to put your faith in gender stereotypes then you I guess you also believe that all men are bad at listening. And it's kinda hard to understand why someone is upset if you're unable to listen.

solskytz

I didn't get it - and I'm a Scientologist...

pymQ

Batgirl in #299 is generous in that she(?) depicts an enlightened society in which girls and women can join chess clubs and other clubs without fear of harassment and sexism.  I would say her observations are probably also mostly realistic and accurate.  Yes, there are many exceptions but the trend is in the right direction.  How could it not be?  Even though much more male talent is surfacing at young age than female talent for the same reasons that has been a phenomenon for centuries: chess is considered a male domain.  Well, it is.  But just because of human nature and the culture of most societies.   In groups where good competition is encouraged, it is difficult to suppress or intimidate players with talent even when it is unexpected.   You can say that about most chess clubs these days.

solskytz

Oh, that :-) 

etc2000chess

Just disable the d*mn chat!

You could avoid them all easily Wink

nobodyreally
batgirl wrote:

If one compares the status of women a century ago to our status today, the difference is almost mindboggling and even a half-centruy ago the situation was entirely different than it is presently. 

In your neck of the woods, sure.

Unfortunately loads of countries are not even where you were 50 years ago.

batgirl
nobodyreally wrote:
batgirl wrote:

If one compares the status of women a century ago to our status today, the difference is almost mindboggling and even a half-centruy ago the situation was entirely different than it is presently. 

In your neck of the woods, sure.

Unfortunately loads of countries are not even where you were 50 years ago.

Though some are similar, every society is unique. Of course, I speak of the society in which I live and those similar.

nobodyreally
TRextastic wrote:

My guy friends, on the other hand, go play golf. I'm much more interested in playing a round of golf than going clubbing.

Isn't playing golf a bit like club-bing?

Kem_Nebu

Bats...  why?

etc2000chess
alexm2310 wrote:

Yeah disable chat in real life too, works a charm

Gobadod point...

etc2000chess
nobodyreally wrote:
TRextastic wrote:

My guy friends, on the other hand, go play golf. I'm much more interested in playing a round of golf than going clubbing.

Isn't playing golf a bit like club-bing?

 

Was it that necessary?

RebelRed923
alexm2310 wrote:
RebelRed923 wrote:

 and they cannot help themselves,
If a guy treats women like objects it's never ever because he can't help himself, it's because he thinks he's doing nothing wrong. No one in the history of the world has objectified someone because they couldn't help it. It's just a bs excuse 

I agree that some men use their testosterone driven minds as a "bs excuse" to say vulgar things, but I do not think that being hit on by some inappropriate-chess-playing male or female means I am being objectified as a woman. It is annoying to say the least, but I also get "hit on" by some lesbian chess players too. Although chess.com is not the platform for use as an online dating tool, you are taking your own chances by utilizing anything that is related to online social media. If you want an environment where you are guaranteed to have only intellectual conversation, no vulgarities, and complete loss of sexual tendencies then you must choose games from only those you know or over an actual board in your own home.  **Side note...like I said in my original comment it is always necessary to tell the offender that you do not appreciate their demeanor or verbage...they should never feel as if they are getting away with disrespecting you, but if they become a bother...Disable chat and make sure to checkmate their butt with a smile on your face. **Grinning**

TRextastic

This is what it's really like being a female in a male-dominated community: https://youtu.be/G9AUlHsMlHE?t=1m14s

TRextastic
nobodyreally wrote:
TRextastic wrote:

My guy friends, on the other hand, go play golf. I'm much more interested in playing a round of golf than going clubbing.

Isn't playing golf a bit like club-bing?

 

My eyes just rolled so hard I'm blind now. I'm gonna sue you for all your chess monies.

nobodyreally
TRextastic wrote:
nobodyreally wrote:
TRextastic wrote:

My guy friends, on the other hand, go play golf. I'm much more interested in playing a round of golf than going clubbing.

Isn't playing golf a bit like club-bing?

 

My eyes just rolled so hard I'm blind now. I'm gonna sue you for all your chess monies.

You'd better sue me for my other monies.

trysts
Elubas wrote:
trysts wrote:
MikeCrockett wrote:

can't help but wonder if females make too much of sexism. face it. there are difference between how men an women think and behave. if a man decided to join an all girls synchronized swim team he knows what kind of reaction he'll get. if he doesn't get harassment from the girls you know he'll catch it from the guys .

Sexism is a form of bigotry and it's very very very prevelant in the world. So prevelant that you come to ignore it, until some days you just want to scream. On those days, the days you do scream, men say that you're disturbing their peace...

I would probably take out the "very's" myself, although a lot can depend on the country, etc. And yes, my judgment is limited because I can't actually experience a lot of what you say myself, being a man. But at the same time three very's is a lot, and given the tone some women tend to have, I do wonder if they exaggerate things for the purpose of a battle of the sexes. On one hand I can't totally trust my own instincts, but I can't be a doormat to people either. Women are people and from what I know of people, they don't always express themselves fairly and rationally. Although in any individual case of a woman suffering, I genuinely support her and feel for her.

But yeah I can't really relate to screaming about things in general myself. There are things I hate about this world, but I still express that hate pretty rationally. And I think that communicates things a lot better. We all have problems but remember that we are part of the very world we're complaining about. For the sake of others, we are still responsible for putting in a certain amount of effort to express our problems appropriately. For example, if you're angry on a particular day, try not to take it out on others, no need to spread it, because it makes things even worse. I don't know, just some thoughts. But maybe this will give us a better understanding on the different perspectives that we come from and how that affects us?

And I'm sorry for the blocks of text. I just have ideas that I want out there and frankly, I'm not always sure how to express them. But at least I got them out somehow, even if inefficiently.

I think I should add more "verys", because sexism is so prevelant in the world that you can never have too many. Do you like reading about history? Well then get ready for sexism. Do you like to watch movies? Then get ready for sexism. Are you in the sevice industry? Well sexism is part of the job. Do you read magazines, articles on the Internet, politics, economy, education, academics, sports? Sexism is everywhere. Do you read about other countries besides your own? Are you religious? Sexism is is a worldwide thoughtwide historical tradition. In language, communication, the arts, it's everywhere. Personal experience and accute empathy will always give you a seven course meal of sexism. So, sometimes I scream...Wink

najdorf96

Indeed. There was a time, when Aol was at the beginning of social media, that there were chats that were categorized into many congenial conversations. Obviously 20 yrs later, the situation has devolved somewhat. Where it seems playful flirtation, sexual innuendo has been taken to a different level. I never imagined a time when I have commented on soo many forums where women have been treated badly just for being a female chess player. Or that they're "stupid" or wired differently. Or why O why aren't there many high level female players.

najdorf96

I'd posted a statement in a similar thread, that I often felt men generally regurgitated these sentiments simply because they want more female interaction on a site mainly dominated by men. Although when a woman initiates such laments, I guess I naturally become skeptical. Especially if it's from someone I've never seen in the forums.

I'm like, "when is she going to reply to the many queries, advice, or engage in a real conversation?"

Elubas
batgirl wrote:

Personally, I have found very little overt sexism during my life.  Most of that which I have encountered has been either clothed in jocularity or camoulflaged with layers of more observable motives.  Occassional blatant and rude remarks I attibute to those individuals' lack of self-restraint rather than some general social failure.   I believe any group, however it's defined, suffers from this type of bigotry - just some more than others.  If one compares the status of women a century ago to our status today, the difference is almost mindboggling and even a half-centruy ago the situation was entirely different than it is presently.  This to me is an indication of a society able to become less close-minded, intolerant, and rigid if given reasons to do so.   It's interesting to me to note that women's rights (that is, rights equal to that of men) followed the heels of racial civil rights. Maybe women owe something to the Civil Rights movement, although women are hardly a minority.   I feel most men, by a high degree, are good-hearted and that much of the discrimination that occurs is either out of ignorance or just lack of consideration but not out of some mean or evil intent (though some of that exists). But I also believe there is a residual effect whereas notions of old linger on in the subconscious and sometimes manifest themselves.  So, I'd say I occasionally get miffed by certain expressed attitudes but in day-to-day life, I don't feel inadequate and seldom feel treated as if I am.  One can change a society only so much by treating the outside; the inside needs time to catch up. I think that's where we're at right now.

Yeah I agree with this whole comment. This is generally how I imagined the "first world sexism" -- bad, but not hideously so. I just observe men and women working together everywhere I go, and while, yes, there is probably stuff going on behind the scenes, we just seem very, very far from the extreme times of the past, and that has had a very positive impact on women compared to before. Though I also agree that there are still residual psychological kinds of effects, where it's still more natural for a lot of people to think of a male leader for example because of how the past was. So it's there, but it seems like the kind of thing some women will exaggerate when they want people to feel guilty about them or if they said something mean towards men one day and didn't at all want to consider that, maybe they could have been more respectful. It's easier to just say, "my life is hard, so I don't have to be nice to people," but it's not a great excuse in my opinion. I feel for those with a hard life, but the "nice to people" part is also important to me.

This forum topic has been locked