luckisK wrote:
In 100 games almost all players I confronted were very strong whereas they were rated 1450-1550, whereas in other 100 games almost all played bad and normal and they were rated 1550-1750. An explanation for this is that many of those very strong players were using computer to decide their moves, and by luck I confronted many of them in a raw. But this means that a great percentage, e.g. the 25% of players are using computer to cheat! Does administration try to detect them somehow? Note that they might not always use such high as 2300 rated computer, when a weaker computer is enough.
You can't discuss cheating in the main forum
Join the Cheating Forum club.
In 100 games almost all players I confronted were very strong whereas they were rated 1450-1550, whereas in other 100 games almost all played bad and normal and they were rated 1550-1750. An explanation for this is that many of those very strong players were using computer to decide their moves, and by luck I confronted many of them in a raw. But this means that a great percentage, e.g. the 25% of players are using computer to cheat! Does administration try to detect them somehow? Note that they might not always use such high as 2300 rated computer, when a weaker computer is enough.