Lets bow to the allmighty dollar!
what will chess.com be like in the future; an omimous warning about trolling
Increased activity = increased ad clicks. Increased ad clicks = Increased revenue. Trolls = Increased activity. HOWEVER there is an event horizon at which the number of trolls change the premise of the site and thus reduce membership and therefore, activity.
Increased activity = increased ad clicks. Increased ad clicks = Increased revenue. Trolls = Increased activity. HOWEVER there is an event horizon at which the number of trolls change the premise of the site and thus reduce membership and therefore, activity.
Ownership has to decide wether they want a clicks/dollars, or a decent site to play chess.
I for one have grown more weary of the term "troll", than of the behavior which spawned said term. If i see posts of that kind in forums or wherever i simply ignore them. The only other word i hate more these days is selfie.
Increased activity = increased ad clicks. Increased ad clicks = Increased revenue. Trolls = Increased activity. HOWEVER there is an event horizon at which the number of trolls change the premise of the site and thus reduce membership and therefore, activity.
Ownership has to decide wether they want a clicks/dollars, or a decent site to play chess.
Businessmen, like Erik, didn't get into business for the chess lol
I'm not sure how much more I should say. but I'd be interested if they are others that think about when and if they are ready to disengage over the trolling. and what yall think you SHOULD do about the very real possibility that future participants of chess.com will be meaner, gnarlier and trollier than they now.
As the article said, it's just human nature. I think intellectually and emotionally most people aren't up for civil discourse. I mean, just look at our recent election. Were people debating policy and facts? Or was it like a high school popularity contest on a national scale?
If (or as it says when) the internet becomes toxic, then reasonable people wont participate, and it will be left to fester. That's my, I suppose pessimistic, opinion. There's nothing we can do about it, but also there's nothing that needs to be done.
Increased activity = increased ad clicks. Increased ad clicks = Increased revenue. Trolls = Increased activity. HOWEVER there is an event horizon at which the number of trolls change the premise of the site and thus reduce membership and therefore, activity.
Ownership has to decide wether they want a clicks/dollars, or a decent site to play chess.
Businessmen, like Erik, didn't get into business for the chess lol
Oh no doubt. Erik is here to make money first and foremost. Chess is secondary.
Increased activity = increased ad clicks. Increased ad clicks = Increased revenue. Trolls = Increased activity. HOWEVER there is an event horizon at which the number of trolls change the premise of the site and thus reduce membership and therefore, activity.
Ownership has to decide wether they want a clicks/dollars, or a decent site to play chess.
Businessmen, like Erik, didn't get into business for the chess lol
Oh no doubt. Erik is here to make money first and foremost. Chess is secondary.
Thou shalt not take the name of Erik in vain
that would really mess up my income source , im about to release my latest novel "Erik the 99 year old virgin goes bangkok "
Increased activity = increased ad clicks. Increased ad clicks = Increased revenue. Trolls = Increased activity. HOWEVER there is an event horizon at which the number of trolls change the premise of the site and thus reduce membership and therefore, activity.
Ownership has to decide wether they want a clicks/dollars, or a decent site to play chess.
Businessmen, like Erik, didn't get into business for the chess lol
Oh no doubt. Erik is here to make money first and foremost. Chess is secondary.
There is more money in other endeavors than chess. Based on the bio he has out there, chess certainly was a passion and being able to turn it into a business (he had a chess business before chess.com too) and be successful, certainly counts for a lot. So, I seriously doubt it was about the money.
?
Didn't he get an MBA from some expensive college? He bought the domain for cheap and made a ton of money. Ok, so maybe he also likes chess. I don't understand why you would seriously doubt a businessman isn't in it for the money.
I for one have grown more weary of the term "troll", than of the behavior which spawned said term. If i see posts of that kind in forums or wherever i simply ignore them. The only other word i hate more these days is selfie.
I think the biggest problem with the word is that its misused
some people call their brand of humor "trolling"
but for most. trolling is not about joking. trolling is about getting people mad.
since its misused and usually said as a general insult; I understand the feeling. on the other hand. people DO act poorly online sometime and there needs to be a word for describing insults, mockery,etc.
back on topic....
Trolls are like weeds.....weeds need water...without it they will die, dry up and wither away....
Trolls seek attention, they need someone to respond to them, if they don't get that, they will briefly say their piece and soon go away....
Solution....don't respond to a troll....at all....no matter how much you may be tempted to.....s/he will then dry up and wither away...
https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2017/03/guys-its-time-for-some-troll-theory/521046/
this fine artlcle lays out the possibility even probability that chess.com will get more and more trolled. why?
"“Very often, hate, anxiety, and anger drive participation with the platform,” said Frank Pasquale, a law professor at the University of Maryland, in the report. “Whatever behavior increases ad revenue will not only be permitted, but encouraged, excepting of course some egregious cases.”
basically ; increasingly. you are here Not to get taught or even to ask questions
but to either
*Be mad
*Get mad
*Be mean
*mock people
and one wonders, should I want to do that? is the forums already too toxic (NO)... but how much further before they ARE toxic.
I'm not sure how much more I should say. but I'd be interested if they are others that think about when and if they are ready to disengage over the trolling. and what yall think you SHOULD do about the very real possibility that future participants of chess.com will be meaner, gnarlier and trollier than they now.
*just don't personally attack people and/or specifically accuse people of trolling or I will have kick you out of the thread.
is that rant enough to get to the "hot topics" list?