I've seen it happen, but in a rapid, where time is not as decisive. The arbiter gave both of the players half of the total time remaining (you can calculate that from another clock). That is far from a fair solution (one player might have a superior position simply because he used double the time)-but what would be fair?
I suppose in a blitz tournament, it would be fairer to simply have them play a new game-though still not a perfect solution (I suppose you'd be angry if you were winning).
Anyways, batteries are to be checked before a tournament. If it was the player's own clock, have them lose the game (a player who forgot to bring material would actually have an advantage). If it was the organizers', a refund might be appropriate.
Still, no good solution. It's just a bad situation to be in.
Hi friends,
I was seeing some You Tube videos of blitz games when I had a weird thought, what would happen if the battery of an electronic chess clock were to go off and the clock stops
?
I understand in large international tournaments, they video record and have giant screens with the time displayed. But how about lower level tournaments? In such a scenario, even if a clock is replaced with a new one, both the players might not necessarily know the time that was actually left in their clocks especially in Blitz games.
Is there any way or rule to resolve an issue like this? Has anyone come across an event like this :).
Thanks and Cheers,
Arun