whats your take on this one?

??? White to move plays 1.a4 and wins

Black to move plays 1...h5 and wins

yes, but can you win, simply by moving first?

Yes, whoever moves wins.  <light goes on>

fireballz maybe you'd better start reading my endgame blogs

http://blog.chess.com/RoboRoy

Someone with an online chess rating of 1917 needs to be told this?

I suspect that fireballz is not all that he seems...

Something that jump to mind is "what influence" does ones experience have on equilibrium.

Two players with exact same tactical insight, will be in equilibrium...would the outcome draw? 

i am a little trouble maker

The natural question would be: "Can it be fair to challenge a stronger oponent?" - i mean, whats the use to push wood, if the pieces seem cosure, but the man behind his men look like some russian, commander/harley-beardedguy? from swaziland-tipping equilibrium in his favour?

-and dont forget to learn from your mistakes;- as if ones oponent did not learn "your" weakness.

fireballz check this out http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1645170/

Its been 12 hours since his post, the LSD should have worn off by now..

Albert Hoffman lives!

White must move 1.a4 here for a win.

you guys are funny.