When to Resign

Sort:
themuz

Just got back from the philippines, very awesome country. I would definitely vacation there.


Markle

 

 Rich, you say asking someone to resign  can be mean but yet you seem to have no problem making your opponent wait for your time to run out in a completely lost game. You may hate resigning but don't just refuse to move and let your time expire that is just rude.


Chiaro2di2luna
Ok, so i agree that the guy is being rude, but did you check how many games he has going on at once.  Usually i have over 30, so maybe it just takes him a while to get back to your game.  also i am one of those people that almost never resigns, and it has payed off.  i get stalemated about 1/6 of the time instead of losing a hopeless position.  I am sorry about your internet bill though.
scizatchel3

so satisficwe u agree yet disagree   make up your mind

 


scizatchel3

ok  here it is  i'm just here to play chess not make enemys.i always thought the point of this game was to win not make someone quit so here i sit the whipping boy of the when to resign forum. so be it.if u play me i will make u prove u can win if thats wrong, oh well.

 


scizatchel3

when i start i game i say hello   and regardless of a win or loss i say goodgame if thats poor sportsmanship then i guess i'm a poor sport

 


RandomPrecision

I admit, if my opponent had two queens, and promoted a pawn to a third, I'd probably stick around and see if I got a stalemate.

 

Against someone with demonstrable mating experience, I think not resigning would be a waste of time.  But when I'm against a rook, bishop, and a queen, and my opponent keeps promoting - either they're just messing with you, or not easily able to checkmate, which makes stalemate an entirely valid possibility. 


neb-c

i checkmated a two guy with two queens but they didn't give up. and i'm going to checkmate a guy with a queen none of them gave up (are givibg up) i don't see the point in wasting your time for a game your going to lose


silentfilmstar13
Rael, I agree that a player could have resigned that game quite early on.  It's important to note that Larla was hanging pieces left and right, though.  I would never resign against a player making so many horrible blunders.  On the merit of such moves alone, I would reason that the chance for a draw is likely enough to warrant battling on.
Larla
However many ways you put it guys, I still won!
OckhamsRazor

I'm amazed at the number of people commiserating with the original poster.  Stalemate is better than a loss, and if you think you can get one, it's within the rules of chess to try to get one.  Even if you DON'T think you can get one, it's within the rules.

 

If you're going to play chess, you have to play it with all the rules, not just the ones you feel are in keeping with your subjective version of "good sportsmanship."

 

Chess is very objective.  The rules are the rules.  If you want to make up some  "street rules," for example, where it's implicitly agreed that a person surrenders if down a certain amount of pawns, then agree on those rules prior to the beginning of the game.  Otherwise, suck it up and play it out, offer a draw, or resign. 

 

The time on the internet costing money is a poor excuse.  It costs a lot of money to play golf, so guess what?  I don't play it if I don't have the money to play it.  That's your personal choice, and you DO have options.  Wait for the move e-mail, for example. 


Larla
I can see you have never been to the Philippines in the Visayas, then, Razor.
lecycliste

Often when it is clear I am losing - and going to lose - but not getting crushed, I will continue in large part to see how my opponent approaches the finish.

 Especially if it is something  a little tricky (pawn endings, etc) 


silentfilmstar13
Larla wrote: However many ways you put it guys, I still won!

You're avoiding the point of this argument almost as cleverly as you avoided the checkmate for so long in your game.

 

Ockham,

I would expect no less logical a point from a member by that name.  Good reply.


OckhamsRazor
Larla wrote: I can see you have never been to the Philippines in the Visayas, then, Razor.

 I've never been to Mars, either, but I'm pretty sure the rules are still the rules there.


Rael

Ockham, you're distorting the issue. Of course a player is well within their right at the end of the day. I've said as much above.

Let me go check your game history and see if you've ever resigned... see if you play lost games through to the last move. What turn would've you resigned in the game I posted? What turn would've you resigned in Larla's game? Don't tell me you wouldn't have in either, assuming those were the moves you were somehow locked in by fate to play...

Ah nevermind. I hate arguing on the internets anyways. Everyone do whatever the hell you like.


leo8160
the problem is not here , the real problem is when its an obvious draw and ur opponent refuse the draw offer, this may last forever....with ur forces at least u can mate in few
DeepGreene

When to resign:  When you feel like it.

When to resent your opponent not resigning:  Never. 


stree7crab

I just received today this message on the chat of an ongoing game where i am slightly losing..."You will loose, so you resign is better !!...

As you all can read, he is encouraging me to resign because i already lost????, is like i dont have the right to fight for a draw, or to wait for a mistake, it will be hard for me to equal the game, is very probably that i am going to lose, but something is sure, is not sure that i am going to loose, and just for reading that, i will take up to three days each single move, i hope the game ends in a few months or more, if I am able to, that game, that is in the 27th move will last until next year, good luck dear opponent!!!!


TheRealThreat
DeepGreene wrote:

When to resign:  When you feel like it.

When to resent your opponent not resigning:  Never. 


You took the words out of my mouth!