any time "time"/thought enters space, it transgresses its bounds..... huh? (kant)
Which comes first - life or death
Sort:
You shouldn't post in the old masters thread, because it blows your cover as a mickey-taker.
Dinosaurs had been laying eggs long before the evolution of the chicken. The egg most certainly came first.
beautifully said. " Harley-Rebel wrote:
death follows life and life follows death. sometimes people live while dead.
it's like chickens and eggs, the egg came before the chicken and the chicken came before the egg.
Aug 9, 2015
0
#46
future doesnt exist. only past present and the space between. and so past and present neither. just the space
Aug 9, 2015
0
#47
Trash_Aesthetic wrote:
future doesnt exist. only past present and the space between. and so past and present neither. just the space
future doesnt exist obviously, its outside our perimeters..... but the space is an imitation of future in a sense then.......
Death follows life. What has never lived cannot be dead. Thus the temporal order* for any given individual is
Stage 1 - Pure nothingness
Stage 2 - Life
Stage 3 - Death
*) The temporal order reffered to is the chronological one, as measured in years, not the lived temporal order.
btw, you know that guy Trash_Aesthetic ? Well that's actually you! (you're quoting his posts) and did you ever encounter truth with a middle finger raised ?
Aug 10, 2015
0
#54
if future is to exist it must not be dependent upon past and present but rather be the originator, the unconditioned cause of past and present itself (by separating past and present)
everybody out! nothing more to see here.
so are you saying space is a fiction???? only thought exists
(as kant said)
space is a fiction and a representation of thought????