h pawn. Enough said.
Which do you think is the most usefull piece and WHY ?????
Τhe queen by far... can support other pieces, defend sufficiently and attack in the same time.
I agree with you but I like the knight too. It is very usefull for traps.
And funny for the same reason.
The King's position is unique and cannot be a part of this argument, as when it is inevitably lost, the game is also lost. As an active attacking or defending piece, it is comparatively insignificant. Having said this, I don't see that it can be denied that the Queen is the most powerful and therefore valuable piece, in view of its extra mobility. The only piece which it cannot mimmick is the knight,
The King's position is unique and cannot be a part of this argument, as when it is inevitably lost, the game is also lost. As an active attacking or defending piece, it is comparatively insignificant. Having said this, I don't see that it can be denied that the Queen is the most powerful and therefore valuable piece, in view of its extra mobility. The only piece which it cannot mimmick is the knight,
That means that you think the most usefull piece is the knight, yeah????
If yes I agree with you.
Allow me to restate: H pawn.
Thats your opinion my friend and pawn is usefull since it can be a queen, knight, rook or bishop. And without pawns you cant make a strong defense.
Anyway, i still support the knight.
The King's position is unique and cannot be a part of this argument, as when it is inevitably lost, the game is also lost. As an active attacking or defending piece, it is comparatively insignificant. Having said this, I don't see that it can be denied that the Queen is the most powerful and therefore valuable piece, in view of its extra mobility. The only piece which it cannot mimmick is the knight,
That means that you think the most usefull piece is the knight, yeah????
If yes I agree with you.
Would you exchange your Queen for a knight? If so, I'd love to give you a game.

Allow me to restate: H pawn.
Thats your opinion my friend...
Cleary. My friend.
The King's position is unique and cannot be a part of this argument, as when it is inevitably lost, the game is also lost. As an active attacking or defending piece, it is comparatively insignificant. Having said this, I don't see that it can be denied that the Queen is the most powerful and therefore valuable piece, in view of its extra mobility. The only piece which it cannot mimmick is the knight,
That means that you think the most usefull piece is the knight, yeah????
If yes I agree with you.
Would you exchange your Queen for a knight? If so, I'd love to give you a game.
haha, i dont think that i would exchange my queen for a knight but i played to games with someone who exchanged his queen to me for my bishop (in both games) so... you never know about your opponent.
And i wouldnt say NO for a game with you.

The most valuable piece is the one you do not want to exchange for a another one of your opponent's, same or different value
The most valuable piece is the one you do not want to exchange for a another one of your opponent's, same or different value
Good view of the pieces.
Kingside knight has been my favourite on defending the h2/a7 pawn when my king is fianchettoed. Simple
both knights are very usefull
The queen, why?
The rook, why?
The knight, why?
The pawns, why?
The king, why?
The bishop, why?
Just tell me which and why. I would like to compare my opinion with yours.