I agree entirely, and it's so stupid that you need to use a credit card to get a free trial, if I was the owner of the world I would make that illegal so that I could learn from the game. This website is ultimately pay to win, the only reason I use it is that it has 4 player chess and more players than any other chess website
ok but. who ever asked
I made it to 2351 without ever paying a penny.
But you are not a real 2351.
I made it to 2351 without ever paying a penny.
But you are not a real 2351.
That's what they tell me.
I made it to 2351 without ever paying a penny.
But you are not a real 2351.
That's what they tell me.
No, it's what you tell yourself.
Pay 2 Win is something entirely different. You only pay for features, not for winning. So no.
I agree entirely, and it's so stupid that you need to use a credit card to get a free trial, if I was the owner of the world I would make that illegal so that I could learn from the game. This website is ultimately pay to win, the only reason I use it is that it has 4 player chess and more players than any other chess website
ok but. who ever asked
i asked.
this site is so insanely p2w it makes honkai star rail look like a f2p game
THANK YOU
Pay to win?
I've never given chess.com a single penny. Rated 2351 daily.
youve had premium for 2 years
Pay 2 Win is something entirely different. You only pay for features, not for winning. So no.
you kinda need game review to actually get rating
3 years*
I didn't pay for it.
Or use it.
Check how many puzzles or lessons I've tried, in more than 10 years.
why tho u got premium for free you should use it
I was champion of four Canadian provinces. I drew a game against freaking MIKHAIL TAL back when he was ranked #4 in the world.
You'll have to pardon me if I don't do chess.com's puzzles and lessons.
something tells me that other site is lichess . org
and yes chess.com is p2w the only reason why i have diamond is because a family member said they would pay it for me
chess.com locks everything behind a paywall and i recommend using lichess
i think chess.com should tell us the average ratings of people with a membership vs people who don't.
i bet people with a diamond membership have much higher ratings, this site is pay 2 win
why? coz they give it to free for every titled player, and titled players are usually better than non titled players
come up with an actual argument
I tend to think the site uses algorithms to keep players on the losing side, over the past year I have been close to breaking even but I've never won more games than I have lost.
mathematically impossible
for every game someone loses, someone else wins
btw ppl with positive win rates do exist, like me (last time i checked)
Only if some people could pay to get a brain ....