Who was the all time best

Sort:
dannyhume

Almost immediately after the liberation of Paris, Alekhine publicly stated that "he had to write two chess articles for the Pariser Zeitung before the Germans granted him his exit visa ... Articles which Alekhine claims were purely scientific were rewritten by the Germans, published and made to treat chess from a racial viewpoint." He wrote at least two further disavowals, in an open letter to the organizer of the 1946 London tournament (W. Hatton-Ward) and in his posthumous book ¡Legado!. These three denials are phrased differently.[113]

Wiki

113. ^ a b c d e "Was Alekhine a Nazi?". Retrieved 2008-05-20.2Fwww.chesshistory.com%2Fwinter%2Fextra%2Falekhine.html&rfr_id=info:sid/en.wikipedia.org:Alexander_Alekhine">  Winter cites many original documents including:

  • Alekhine Nazi Articles, a privately printed booklet edited by Ken Whyld, that contains an English translation of the Pariser Zeitung articles;
  • Alekhine's disavowal of these articles in News Review, November 23, 1944, also reported in British Chess Magazine December 1944 and Chess January 1945;
  • Alekhine's posthumous book ¡Legado!;
  • interviews in the September 3, 1941 editions of El Alcázar and Informaciones, which report Alekhine as making anti-Semitic statements about chess.

 

So if we believe Wiki referencing Winter referencing his sources, then Alekhine admitted to writing the letters but under coercion +/- Nazi scumbag editing.  If he wrote them under coercion or they were tampered with (much like religionists do with history and science), then my and others' accusations of Alekhine being a Nazi scumbag are false.   I hope he was not a Nazi scumbag.   

Regardless, Alekhine is easily among the 2nd greatest players of all time.  Still a chicken$#!+ for ducking Capa yet hypocritically accepting rematches with Bugoljubow (greatest name ever in chess history) and Euwe.  

goldendog
raul72 wrote:

 I hope you're kidding---I spend less than a tenth of the time you spend on this site. Like Fischer, most of the stuff on this site is juvenile drivel. Very little is worth reading. Check out your posts this past week and then count mine. Buddy, its going to be at least 10 to 1 in your favor.

I may be doing 120 mph here but that's no defense for someone doing 90! You post plenty here and have time on your hands. That was my point: We're all in the same boat.

You sound like you want me to give you hard research when I post? Who in the world does that. What I'm mostly going to give is an educated guess that has a ring of truth to it. Thats more than I get when I read the forum.

When it's posible to cite facts  it's good to do so. My point, again, was that we shouldn't confuse speculation for facts.

You seem to think the guys around here need protection from big, bad Raul. I only attack when I'm attacked. I've learned a long time ago---guys dont like to be corrected. Guys dont like to admit they made a mistake. Chess talk is peculiar---its an ego thing. If someone is nice to me, I'll be nice to them---but I'm still going to correct them which will piss them off.  

I hope it doesn't seem that I think guys here need protection from you. Don't feel that way and I never said it. Fair enough?


TheOldReb

Excuse me but lets be logical here , chess players ARE logical are they not ? I do NOT believe and NEVER will believe that any " Nazi scumbag " would ever marry a jewish woman !  Am I the only one who sees something terribly wrong with this picture ?! We all DO know that Alekhine was in occupied territory and his wife was jewish so it is VERY possible any such articles he wrote to appease the nazis may have been under duress, is it not ? I  believe he would have done anything to survive under such circumstances as would MOST of us here ! Lets also keep in mind what happened to Alekhine and his family under the communists in Russia ( many of whom were jewish btw ) . His brother was killed, his family lost everything to the communist thieves and he himself was jailed for a time and was lucky to get out of Russia alive. The Nazis hated communists and wanted to kill them all ( jewish or not didnt matter ) so I can see Alekhine even having some sympathy for the Nazis in this aspect given his own personal history with the communists. Why was he black listed and Keres not ?  This is something I truly don't understand. Alekhine was a huge self-centered opportunist by all accounts and I dont doubt for a minute that he would write such articles under duress and in order to be able to play in tournaments so he could feed himself and his wife. I for one don't believe everything I read and its always a mistake , imo, to believe people who hate someone when gathering "evidence" against someone. We all need to think for ourselves sometime. 

marcelom2

yes Webhead, everybody sais Bobby Fischer

jesterville

Reb,

Your position that "chess players are logical" is false...and can be easily proven by a cursory view of postings on this cite...because someone plays chess, that does not automatically make them anything...including intelligent and logical.

Also, your position that a Nazi would never marry a jew...while it seems logical, it may not be entirely correct...sometimes we do the opposite of what we really are to hide the truth from the public...we all know the examples of homosexuals who marry women to hide from the public their true personas, ala the famous movie star Rock Hudson, or even I suspect Michael Jackson...and even the ongoing rumours of Tom Cruz.

I hold no opinion on this arguement currently, since it is the first time I am hearing it, and need to do some research....

raul72

If someone is accused of something and he admits it---its a case closed slamdunk. We can move on to the next chess mystery. But here we are still debating on whether he actually wrote those articles. Its been 70 years and we're still debating. why---because he always denied it. Everytime someone brought it up he denied it. It was never decided in a court of law. It was never decided in a FIDE hearing. The case is still open and as Edward Winters says---It's still debatable.

And even if it did go to an official hearing and it was decided he did write those articles---I do believe Reb could get him off.  In one of his matches with Euwe for the championship Alekhine had a jewish second---Salo Landau.

I've got to tell you this story about Euwe. Euwe wrote to Alekhine sometime during the war asking Alekhine to help free some chess players from Nazi concentration camps. This was a kind thing for Euwe to do but Alekhine was unable to do anything for those guys. One of those guys was Landau his second in the championship match. They perished and Euwe was livid and remained so for many years. Think about it---Did Botvinnik ever get anyone out of prison---did Karpov or Kasparov. Did Fischer ever get anyone out of prison (lo). Did Euwe ?  Can you imagine Alekhine calling up the commandant of Auschwitz and saying ---I want you to release some Jewish prisoners immediately! Alekhine would have been shot! Alekhine was so low on the totem pole he was bumming cigarettes. 

 Euwe led the charge against his invitation to the victory tournament in London after the war. He was adamant that Alekhine should not be invited, and Alekhine's invitation was retracted.  I think Euwe and many masters wanted to strip Alekhine of his championship.

And so it goes...

indurain

My view is that you can only compare players to their contemporaries and therefore using this criteria I would nominate Paul Morphy, Mikhail Tal, Bobby Fischer, Anatoly Karpov and Garry Kasparov as contenders to this title.

Each in their own way was way ahead of their contemporaries.

Karpov between 1975-1985, Kasparov between 1990-2005, Fischer between 1970-1972, Tal between 1958-1961 and Morphy between 1858-1870 each showed resulted that were far in excess of their contemporaries.

dannyhume

Anything is possible and there are "logical" reasons to believe Alekhine wrote his letters under duress, but there is evidence that he was anti-semitic prior to Nazis.  Hopefully Alekhine wasn't a Nazi scumbag, but I am not going to believe it simply because he denied it immediately after the Nazi's lost or because he was married to a Jew or is the 2nd greatest player ever or because he was "mentally ill" or whatever other bull$#!+ excuses people make for their flawed heroes.  No one is questioning his chess brilliance.  Anyone can argue one view or the other and make others sound stupid. But then again, anyone can make the Blackmar-Diebert gambit theoretically "sound" against me.  Let the historians decide Alekhine's allegiance.   

raul72
dannyhume wrote:

Anything is possible and there are "logical" reasons to believe Alekhine wrote his letters under duress, but there is evidence that he was anti-semitic prior to Nazis.  Hopefully Alekhine wasn't a Nazi scumbag, but I am not going to believe it simply because he denied it immediately after the Nazi's lost or because he was married to a Jew or is the 2nd greatest player ever or because he was "mentally ill" or whatever other bull$#!+ excuses people make for their flawed heroes.  No one is questioning his chess brilliance.  Anyone can argue one view or the other and make others sound stupid. But then again, anyone can make the Blackmar-Diebert gambit theoretically "sound" against me.  Let the historians decide Alekhine's allegiance.   


 " Let the historians decide Alekhine's allegiance."   They've been debating for 70 years---you think they'll come to a decision before the world ends?Smile 

Look at Alekhine's death. How many different versions of his death are there? Here are a few---he was shot, he was hanged, he choked, stroke, heart attack...

Was the photo staged? was he killed somewhere else and then move back to his hotel room. We've never solved the 1910 Lasker-schlechter match. Back to Alekhine---did he really dodge Capablanca---was he afraid of a rematch? Why was Staunton such an ass to Morphy and was that the beginning of Morphy's psychosis?

Did Keres throw all those games to Botvinnik in 48' championship tournament? Did Kasparov really let go of the knight? Was there a man on the grassy knoll? Did Fischer really say Chess is better than sex? Did the spectators really shower Marshall with gold pieces at Breslau 1912? Are there any idiot savants in chess-who?

raul72
Fezzik wrote:

The evidence, Nazgul, was presented by Batgirl. Euwe claimed to be an eyewitness to his anti-semitic comments. In the interview, Euwe didn't say that Alekhine was drunk. I'm not sure that's a defense anyway. (Take, for instance, Mel Gibson's drunken tirades.)

But as far as I know he certainly never wrote anything like the articles that were published under his name for the Nazis before the war. 

The fact that Alekhin didn't publicly denounce the articles during the war shows to me that he at least accepted them. He may have done so, as he claimed, because of the pressures for him to obtain a travel visa and protection for his family. 

Perhaps Raul can enlighten us.


 Fezzik, your naivete concerning chess history never ceases to amaze me. Batgirl didnt present doodly squat. Alekhine denied all that stuff.

Euwe was heavily biased against Alekhine for various reasons. Read "The Complete Book of Chess" by Horowitz. The chapter on Alekhine gives some of the reasons Euwe was biased. One of the reasons I've already stated. Euwe thought Alekhine had a lot more influence with the Nazis than he really did. He could not help prisoners in concentration camps---he could not set them free. I dont think he had any influence.

Here is a quote from a letter to Hatton Ward,  who was on the committee of the London victory tournament. "Dr. Euwe was so convinced of my influence with the Nazis that he wrote me two letters asking me to take steps to alleviate the lot of poor Landau and my friend Dr. Oskam...but in germany and the occupied countries we were under constant surveillance and threat of the concentration camp from the Gestapo. I can understand Dr. Euwe's reaction, its very natural. But, like so many others, he is sadly mistaken." 

"The charge of collaboration is generally directed to those who fell in with the Vichy Government. But I never had anything to do with that government or its officials. I played in Germany and the occupied countries because that was not only our means of subsistence but also the price of my wife's liberty. Going back in memory to the situation I found myself four years ago, I maintain today that I should act in the exact same way."

 Fezzik, you say ---"The fact that Alekhin didn't publicly denounce the articles during the war shows to me that he at least accepted them."

Fezzik are you for real? If the Nazis had their boots on the back of your and batgirl's neck---you guys are going to act differently?  What if they had your loved ones as hostages? Fezzik this is not the comic books! If you got bold with the Nazis---you got dead!

You know what Fezzik---I'll bet during the war the comics did have super heroes like Batman, Superman and Captain Marvel kicking the crap out of Nazis.Tongue out

How does this sound---Batgirl and Fezzikman to the rescue!  KissKiss

fyy0r

Who cares if Alekhine was anti-semetic or not, that doesn't stop us from loving Bobby Fischer!

Hahahaha!

dannyhume
Well, then I guess the Nuremburg trials were unfair because those gestapos were under threat of execution if they did not follow Nazi orders. It's all relative anyway. It sounds like Mr. Alekhine did not deny that he wrote the letters but that he was forced to write them in some way or another. He denounced them after the war but it still leaves that stain of doubt, of a weasel who sides with winners (most of us would do that, though). Those letters of his in France won't be released until 1917, so there will be more pieces to this puzzle then. And of course, new historical documents find ways to present themselves all the time, like the dead sea scrolls or that Australian lady who showed that Pat Sullivan may have in fact created Felix the cat as opposed to Otto Mesmer. History is mostly consensus based on available evidence. Mr. raul and Reb, I may not agree with what you say but I will defend to the death your right to say it, unless of course I am in Nazi-occupied territory with a Jewish wife. I am surprised Webhead has not made any comments about Fischer in this thread. I see a thoroughly documented Batgirl article all about this and the current available historical evidence and arguments up to this point....
Jebcc

I have seen several forums where Bobby Fischer is referred to as a jew-hater or in some an "anti-semite." I don't know much about Bobby so I went t wikipedia etc. Here is one of many links on the internet that say Fischer was a jew: http://www.jinfo.org/Chess_Players.html.  Can a Jew be a Jew Hater or a so called "anti-semite"?  Are those who say these things accusing him of being some-kind of race traitor?  I have heard this kind of allegation made against Clarence Thomas by black guys  that do not like his jurisprudence on the supreme court. I happen to be a Clarence Thomas fan.  I am afraid I would be pilloried if I said I like Bobby Fischer as the greatest Chess player the world has ever known amazing. a miracle.

peace1776

Kasparov

TheOldReb

                  STOP   THE   HATE 

Tricklev
fyy0r wrote:
Reb wrote:
fyy0r wrote:
raul72 wrote:
fyy0r wrote:
raul72 wrote:

You didn't finish the quote---"I just want to play chess until i'm 29!!"

After Fischer made his millions in 92' he lived very well for the rest of his life. He travelled, he ate in the best restaurants, He consorted with pretty girls who were half his age. Like Spassky, Karpov, and Kasparov---he was living the high life. He was spending money like it was water and he was loving it.  And, he left quite a bit for friends and relatives to fight over when he went to live in that glorious chess club in the sky.

 As per Karpov--- I refer to Sex 101 ---Short, dull, funny looking guys with beautiful dolls draped all over them ---are rich!

This first sex lesson is free. If you require more it will cost you.


Bobby Fischer had $3 million (listen here) left out of approx $3.5 million of his winnings in 1992 when he died, not exactly "living the high life".  His 1972 earnings were gone, mostly thanks to the Worldwide Church of God donations he gave with a big smile on his face (and later regretted).  His book earnings ran dry, his 1972 winnings were gone, so he resurfaced in 1992 in order to get some cash to live on for the rest of his life.  The 1992 rematch he won, which gave him somewhere around $3.5 million, which he lived on until he died only using approx $500,000 of it. 


 Man oh man---I wish you guys who like to talk Fischer actually knew something about Fischer. There must be a hundred books on Fischer---perhaps that many dvds and radio interviews etc., etc.

Fischer said on interviews over the radio that he invested heavily in precious metals after he won the 3.5 million. He said "I spend a million and I make a million. he said in 2006 or 2007 that although he was spending money like it was going out of style---he still had as almost as much as he had in 92'.

I suggest you do better research before making these incorrect statements about Fischer.


 

You may be correct on the precious metals part.  Although I doubt you listened to all the radio interviews in order to garner that knowledge.  Because I have, and the number of hours of mindless jew hating is tough to sift through when looking for chess related insight from the man.  It's a pity I have to side against Fischer with you, because he's one of my top 5 favorites, but someone must, because other greats don't get enough credit from you in my opinion.  

 

I side against Fischer when talking with raul72, because you are head over heels in love with him

I side with Fischer when talking with Fezzik, because he treats him like an ex husband

Funny how that works.


Of all the GIANTS of chess Fischer and Spassky will always be my favorites and its because of their match in 72 that I got involved in serious/tournament chess. For this reason they are my favorites and Fischer beats out Spassky ( as a chess player ) because he won their match and he is American afterall ...... yeah , I have a tad of nationalism in me..... who doesnt ??  As far as Fischer going nuts and becoming a paranoid, hatefilled, bitter  human being in the endgame of his life this has no influence on me when rating him as a chess player and the contribution he made to the game that brings all of us here. 


 

I love Spassky, that guy is so laid back and chilled.  And the amount of respect he showed Fischer (I already posted about the details a page or two back) without seeing much in return is unbelievable. 

Another example I can think of is his letter to the president about the 1992 match in Yugoslavia, where the government condemned Fischer partaking in it.  Spassky wrote to the president "Well I took part in it too, so if you want to jail Fischer, jail me as well and put us in the same cell with a chessboard".   Fischer's response when he saw the letter was something along the lines of "Bah! I don't want a cell with him, put me in a cell with that Kosteniuk chick".  

Fischer has said if Spassky wasn't Russian they would probably have been good friends.  Fischer referred to Spassky as his "frienemy".

Myself personally, I didn't know much about Spassky before reading about him in their 1972 match, but once I did my respect for him jumped 10 fold and now he's one of my favorite players.  Laid back, chilled, funny, loves chess, and is great at it.

Watch Spassky, love Spassky


I never knew Fischer had a liking for 8 year olds, this is even worse than his racism!

TheOldReb
Tricklev wrote:
fyy0r wrote:
Reb wrote:
fyy0r wrote:
raul72 wrote:
fyy0r wrote:
raul72 wrote:

You didn't finish the quote---"I just want to play chess until i'm 29!!"

After Fischer made his millions in 92' he lived very well for the rest of his life. He travelled, he ate in the best restaurants, He consorted with pretty girls who were half his age. Like Spassky, Karpov, and Kasparov---he was living the high life. He was spending money like it was water and he was loving it.  And, he left quite a bit for friends and relatives to fight over when he went to live in that glorious chess club in the sky.

 As per Karpov--- I refer to Sex 101 ---Short, dull, funny looking guys with beautiful dolls draped all over them ---are rich!

This first sex lesson is free. If you require more it will cost you.


Bobby Fischer had $3 million (listen here) left out of approx $3.5 million of his winnings in 1992 when he died, not exactly "living the high life".  His 1972 earnings were gone, mostly thanks to the Worldwide Church of God donations he gave with a big smile on his face (and later regretted).  His book earnings ran dry, his 1972 winnings were gone, so he resurfaced in 1992 in order to get some cash to live on for the rest of his life.  The 1992 rematch he won, which gave him somewhere around $3.5 million, which he lived on until he died only using approx $500,000 of it. 


 Man oh man---I wish you guys who like to talk Fischer actually knew something about Fischer. There must be a hundred books on Fischer---perhaps that many dvds and radio interviews etc., etc.

Fischer said on interviews over the radio that he invested heavily in precious metals after he won the 3.5 million. He said "I spend a million and I make a million. he said in 2006 or 2007 that although he was spending money like it was going out of style---he still had as almost as much as he had in 92'.

I suggest you do better research before making these incorrect statements about Fischer.


 

You may be correct on the precious metals part.  Although I doubt you listened to all the radio interviews in order to garner that knowledge.  Because I have, and the number of hours of mindless jew hating is tough to sift through when looking for chess related insight from the man.  It's a pity I have to side against Fischer with you, because he's one of my top 5 favorites, but someone must, because other greats don't get enough credit from you in my opinion.  

 

I side against Fischer when talking with raul72, because you are head over heels in love with him

I side with Fischer when talking with Fezzik, because he treats him like an ex husband

Funny how that works.


Of all the GIANTS of chess Fischer and Spassky will always be my favorites and its because of their match in 72 that I got involved in serious/tournament chess. For this reason they are my favorites and Fischer beats out Spassky ( as a chess player ) because he won their match and he is American afterall ...... yeah , I have a tad of nationalism in me..... who doesnt ??  As far as Fischer going nuts and becoming a paranoid, hatefilled, bitter  human being in the endgame of his life this has no influence on me when rating him as a chess player and the contribution he made to the game that brings all of us here. 


 

I love Spassky, that guy is so laid back and chilled.  And the amount of respect he showed Fischer (I already posted about the details a page or two back) without seeing much in return is unbelievable. 

Another example I can think of is his letter to the president about the 1992 match in Yugoslavia, where the government condemned Fischer partaking in it.  Spassky wrote to the president "Well I took part in it too, so if you want to jail Fischer, jail me as well and put us in the same cell with a chessboard".   Fischer's response when he saw the letter was something along the lines of "Bah! I don't want a cell with him, put me in a cell with that Kosteniuk chick".  

Fischer has said if Spassky wasn't Russian they would probably have been good friends.  Fischer referred to Spassky as his "frienemy".

Myself personally, I didn't know much about Spassky before reading about him in their 1972 match, but once I did my respect for him jumped 10 fold and now he's one of my favorite players.  Laid back, chilled, funny, loves chess, and is great at it.

Watch Spassky, love Spassky


I never knew Fischer had a liking for 8 year olds, this is even worse than his racism!


This is the FIRST I have ever heard of this blatant lie, where do you get this from ? 

Tricklev

Reb, if you read the post I quoted, you will see that fyy0r claimed that Fischer wanted Kosteniuk in 1992. My post was sarcasm directed thowards the fact that Kosteniuk was 8 at the time, and that fyy0r obviously made that up.

It was sarcasm directed thowards fyy0r, it was not an attack against Fischer, if you had turned your hero worship down a notch you would have noticed that Reb. Althuogh I have heard claims that Americans have a hard time with sarcasm, so it might not be your fault.

TheOldReb
Tricklev wrote:

Reb, if you read the post I quoted, you will see that fyy0r claimed that Fischer wanted Kosteniuk in 1992. My post was sarcasm directed thowards the fact that Kosteniuk was 8 at the time, and that fyy0r obviously made that up.

It was sarcasm directed thowards fyy0r, it was not an attack against Fischer, if you had turned your hero worship down a notch you would have noticed that Reb. Althuogh I have heard claims that Americans have a hard time with sarcasm, so it might not be your fault.


I see you like to insult Americans , many of whom are jewish. Does that make you anti-semitic ?  Smile

Jebcc
Tricklev wrote:

Reb, if you read the post I quoted, you will see that fyy0r claimed that Fischer wanted Kosteniuk in 1992. My post was sarcasm directed thowards the fact that Kosteniuk was 8 at the time, and that fyy0r obviously made that up.

It was sarcasm directed thowards fyy0r, it was not an attack against Fischer, if you had turned your hero worship down a notch you would have noticed that Reb. Althuogh I have heard claims that Americans have a hard time with sarcasm, so it might not be your fault.


Women use sarcasm in lieu of humor.  Women often complain that men don't get it.  Comprende?