This site seems easy to climb by chomping on hanging pieces

Ill challenge u to a blitz!

Btw I agree with you chomper, there are a lot of stupid mistakes I see that make me wonder if I am facing an 800.

Foreshadowing

This DoYouLikeCurry guy is wrong as usual, no wonder he's hard stuck 1600 or whatever he is.

You're not a titled player just yet. I'm not impressed.

@HangingPiecesChomper,

I’ve been considering the idea that you can “chomp your way up.” And while you argument has actually allowed me to notice that hanging pieces are relatively common at my level in speed chess, I still think your argument is incomplete. Firstly, I have never seen you acknowledge the fact that if you played bad moves, basically doing everything wrong but hanging pieces and taking hanging pieces (could be seen as sandbagging and rating manipulation guys, don’t do it) you would lose a lot of games.

Also, the elephant in the room: You are in the 99.9+ percentile of chess players on the site, even higher in the world seeing as though most people don’t know the rules/don’t play online/don’t use chess.com. I’m 1600 but am still a strong player statistics-wise. But we still keep losing. If it were as simple as chomping, and nothing else, we’d both be masters.

Or at least you would be a master and I would be much stronger

I chomped on hanging pieces and almost won but then I blundered mate.

1900-2000, but okay. You've managed to make this account last a lot longer than your others. Maybe you've learnt some self control to not get banned for abuse, maybe you've found a smarter way to use outside assistance.

One thing remains the same, even if you were as strong as your account suggests (which you might be, who knows), the fact that you spend your time belittling people and creating rage-bait posts is a poor use of your skill. Telling people to pick up hanging pieces is very useful advice for people under about 800 rated. Sure, people hang pieces at every level, but simply noticing pieces that are loose is NOT sufficient to get anywhere close to 2500.

So, if you are that strong, give people better advice. I have yet to see you provide any analysis on any game or about chess in general that would be even loosely in-line with that which I would expect from a player above 2000.

chomper u should play me