Why am I no better after completing 1000 tactics?

Sort:
amplebae
your brain takes time to heal from hardstudy, eat healthy foods, sometimes theirs more than 1 correct answer in a tactic ,the downfall about online tactics,is that they want only 1 correct answer... In my opinion tactics are better otb for that reason..... think your better off with composed studies. study Gligorics work .it should help.
The_Chin_Of_Quinn
amplebae wrote:
your brain takes time to heal from hardstudy, eat healthy foods, sometimes theirs more than 1 correct answer in a tactic ,the downfall about online tactics,is that they want only 1 correct answer... In my opinion tactics are better otb for that reason..... think your better off with composed studies. study Gligorics work .it should help.

chess.com TT only accepts 1 answer. Other sites wont fail you for moves that are also winning, but are not the engine's #1 choice.

easchner

1000 tactics in 4 days is like skipping class all semester then pulling an all nighter the day before the exam to read the textbook.  Sure, you're better off than if you hadn't read it, but it's not like it's going to stick.  It's much better to spend 10 minutes on one problem and really analyze it and understand the solution than just bang through it and redo it until you've memorized 'the pattern'.

ESP-918

REST !

don't forget about rest other ways you are going to burn yourself out take 3 days completely off chess !

Then come back and do the SAME 1000 tactics again , after that repute rest 3 days and 1000 SAME tactics again.

1 month time I GUARANTEE if you follow my instructions your rating will increase by at least 200 points !!!

MickinMD
CantGetRight69 wrote:
shcherbak wrote:

http://chesstempo.com/tactical-motifs.html

credit to whomever post it here, me thinks @Diakonia 

So I could learn all the tactics from that page then get a chess tempo membership which would train me those tactics?

I've been listing that page a lot and it plus the tactics problems themselves only work if your thought processing isn't lazy - and fast games help instill lazy thinking habits because you don't take the time to go through a complete thought procedure.

There are varying examples.  Here's a good one someone (sorry, I cut and pasted it but forget to get the commenter's name) posted here this week:

Pre Move Checklist

  1. Make sure all your pieces are safe.
  2. Look for forcing moves: Checks, captures, threats. You want to look at ALL forcing moves (even the bad ones) this will force you look at, and see the entire board.
  3. If there are no forcing moves, you then want to remove any of your opponent’s pieces from your side of the board.
  4. If your opponent doesn’t have any of his pieces on your side of the board, then you want to improve the position of your least active piece.
  1. After each move by your opponent, ask yourself: "What is my opponent trying to do?"
CantGetRight69
Morphysrevenges wrote:

how come when I go to your home page it does appear you have done any tactics??

Like I said I did the 1000 tactics on lucas chess.

urk
Solving tactics puzzles won't necessarily make you better at finding tactics in real games.
I don't even know why people believe this.
Strangemover

urk wrote:

Solving tactics puzzles won't necessarily make you better at finding tactics in real games.
I don't even know why people believe this.

Agree 100%. In a tactic problem you know there is a winning tactic so you look until you find it. In a game there may be no winning tactic or a tactic which you think is winning but is in fact not. Or you simply let the moment pass by because the position looks normal and you don't expect there to be a tactic there.

tondeaf

Tactic practice is not how you get better.

 

If you watch many titled players, you will see them miss elementary tactics fairly often.

 

 

Rogue_King

Beginner tactics are the place everyone needs to start out, but they aren't gonna let you tactically stomp your opponents. They are better for preventing you from letting your opponent get you with obvious tactics. Also you should go over those problems a few more times, 4 days isn't enough for them to sink into your brain. Higher level tactics will let you actually get people. I'd suggest 303 tricky chess tactics once you've mastered your current problems.

 

Also tactics come from a superior position. If you want lots of tactics in your games you need to learn how to play strategically strong chess. The Amateur's Mind by Silman helped me a lot in that area.

 

 

shcherbak
tondeaf wrote:

Tactic practice is not how you get better.

 

If you watch many titled players, you will see them miss elementary tactics fairly often.

 

 

That's arguable.

sreebaia
CantGetRight69 wrote:

I just finished 1000 beginner tactics on lucas chess and I am no better and still suck. I still take too long to make decisions and when I finally make a decision it is almost always not the best one. Are tactics a waste of time or what is taking so long for improvement? I am completely worn out after spending 4 days in a row finishing them and it seems like that time was spent for nothing.

 

Lucas Chess is not the best tactics site/app . You can try chess.com or tactics chessbase.com

dk-Ltd
NastyNugget wrote:
urk escribió:
I've already said several times on here what I recommend for improvement.

Blitz is obviously completely useless, (bdut nobody ever seems to believe me.)

More mythology:
tactics puzzles doesn't necessarily make you better at finding tactics in actual games.

My opponents with giant tactics ratings who I've destroyed in games can testify to this.

 

That's right. I spent a lot of time improving my TT (I was 1400-1500 for a while and now +1900) but in actual games I can't spot simple tactics!

 

honestly, much respect for your 1900+ tactics rating. But your 60% pass rate, says that you don't give them the time required.

rajatsicilian

completing tactics is not enough.. understand those tactics which you think is good... and practice those tactics regularly... im sure in some days you will know how to apply them against your opponent...

IpswichMatt
Morphysrevenges wrote:

how come when I go to your home page it does appear you have done any tactics??

It's because he did them on Lucas Chess and not on this site, as explained in the opening post.

IpswichMatt
CantGetRight69 wrote:
sparxs wrote:

Tactics is not just memorizing patterns. Tactics training is also understanding tactics and that is being done with one of the many tactics books advised here on the forum and time spent OTB. I started with Predator at the chessboard and would still recommend it. It focuses on explanations of basic tactics. There are still many others. More than anything, take your time and don't rush things. GL

I just bookmarked the predator book on amazon but i'm wondering if their website is good enough or buying the book is a must? Like here is there site http://www.chesstactics.org/ I'm wondering if I need to buy the book if there site seems to have the same information.

IMO that site looks like a good place to start. Then buy a book like the Polgar book suggested above. Solve all of the problems in the book repeatedly until you can solve each one almost instantly.

sparxs

CantGetRight69 wrote:

sparxs wrote:

Tactics is not just memorizing patterns. Tactics training is also understanding tactics and that is being done with one of the many tactics books advised here on the forum and time spent OTB. I started with Predator at the chessboard and would still recommend it. It focuses on explanations of basic tactics. There are still many others. More than anything, take your time and don't rush things. GL

I just bookmarked the predator book on amazon but i'm wondering if their website is good enough or buying the book is a must? Like here is there site http://www.chesstactics.org/ I'm wondering if I need to buy the book if there site seems to have the same information.

Hey man. I started on the site as well. It got everything the books (there are 2) got, content wise. But I'm a bit of a bookworm and for training purposes or for revisiting the patterns the books are more efficient. I got annoyed using it online and switching between pages etc. Also easier on the eyes. But really excellent explanations, training of thought process and a real eye opener how complex simple tactics can be. When I started with PredatC, I already knew more advanced tactics but boy was I missing basic constructs. Hope you have fun with it. Just one more tip....don't overdo it. The brain can't remember scores of tactics so take your time with it. Once you understand the right technique, it'll become easier finding and recognising tactical patterns even without memorising. If you have any more questions pm me or ask here. GL

ChePlaSsYer

No pain no gain, are you sure you felt pain while training?

IpswichMatt
Morphysrevenges wrote:
 

WTH is lucas chess? some star wars site?

That's right, the George Lucas Star Wars Chess Tactics training app - the first 3 modules were OK, but the 3 later modules were slated by the critics

Clark_20
Personally, I feel like solving tactics everyday keeps me in good shape but if you're a beginner I will tell you right now stop worrying about tactics because we need to understand that tactics
come from good positions. Chess isn't 100% tactics you need positional understanding, opening knowledge, principle, etc. It's like you're shaq expecting to hit consistent 3 pointers when he hasn't got his free throws mastered