Why did he resigned !?

Sort:
Avatar of ESP-918

https://youtu.be/Ok8TfvuZC70

Avatar of ESP-918

?

Avatar of ESP-918

MegasAlexandros86 wrote:

Ilegal move, he moved the king in check => instant loss. The oponent stoped the clock.

《 Instant loss !? 》

I disagree, FIDE disagrees.

Avatar of hahahahaiii

because you cheat...using engine to play...idiot

Avatar of ESP-918

?

Avatar of ESP-918

MegasAlexandros86 wrote:

ESP-918 wrote:

MegasAlexandros86 wrote:

Ilegal move, he moved the king in check => instant loss. The oponent stoped the clock.

《 Instant loss !? 》

I disagree, FIDE disagrees.

Read the fide rulles again.

Also you can see the match nakamura - savchenko:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4J4LI_DdzTA

 

See? Savchenko moved the king in check (from a knight), JUST like in this game => instant loss.

 

Please read the FIDE rules again... at blitz and rapid, illegal move = loss of the game, INSTANT.

I think you need to read FIDE rules again , before trying to proove your point here.

You obviously don't know much about chess rules, especially FIDE rules . In blitz and rapid illegal move DOES NOT result in instant loss. That's it.

Avatar of ESP-918

Can someone knowledgeable PLEASE come here, I'm tired of talking to this kids who trying to argue with me and FIDE with outdated video as a proof.

Avatar of ESP-918

#7

I tell you what , you want to bet some $ ? I think I'm right, you think you are right let's settle this once and for all . I wouldn't mind some extra cash.

Avatar of NichtGut

Maybe because his position was losing? I am guessing the opponent stopped the clock to notify the arbiter about an illegal move being made, not because it automatically loses the game. 

Avatar of NichtGut

https://chesstournamentservices.com/2017/08/new-fide-illegal-move-laws-july-1-2017/

 

This site says its a loss in unsupervised blitz. I dont know what they are talking about. 

Supposedly the opponent gets 2 extra minutes the first time his opponent makes an illegal move and then loses the game if he makes an illegal move for the second time. 

Avatar of ESP-918

#13

Thanks James , I think that's exactly it , he just saw no point continuing lost position, especially when he already touched his king aND have to move the king only.

Avatar of ESP-918

#14

Read current blitz and rapid rules, regards an illegal move and instant loss.

YOU ARE NOOB ! WHO plays FIDE tournaments and don't even know the RULES ! AHAHAHAHA

Avatar of Kjasmine008

Some people don't have belts. (ik what u r talking about)

Avatar of ESP-918

MegasAlexandros86 wrote:

ESP-918 wrote:

#14

 

Read current blitz and rapid rules, regards an illegal move and instant loss.

 

YOU ARE NOOB ! WHO plays FIDE tournaments and don't even know the RULES ! AHAHAHAHA

 

NOOB? What's YOUR fide rating?

I don't have one and YET I still know the rules !

Avatar of ESP-918

#17

Shame on you twice, that you have FIDE rating, played many FIDE tournaments and you don't even know the rules !? Come on mate that's totally unacceptable

Avatar of forked_again

Why is this still an argument.  Didn't Nictgut post the rules already in post number 12?

Avatar of ESP-918

22# indeed

But post #17 person STILL thinks he is FIDE rated si he knows better and doesn't want to hear anyone. He continues to give us outdated video as a proof.

Avatar of ESP-918

MegasAlexandros86 wrote:

ESP-918 wrote:

#14

 

Read current blitz and rapid rules, regards an illegal move and instant loss.

 

YOU ARE NOOB ! WHO plays FIDE tournaments and don't even know the RULES ! AHAHAHAHA

 

NOOB? What's YOUR fide rating?

SO did you finally read the rules?