Why do many people quit after losing their queen? - Chess Forums - Page 4

egniib

Sep 21, 2021

0

#61

Well, your oponnent lost quite a bit more than a queen. Losing the queen was probably a good moment to resign. Why not resign if you are dead lost?

AunTheKnight

Sep 21, 2021

0

#62

ChesswithNickolay wrote:

AunTheKnight wrote:

ChesswithNickolay wrote:

AunTheKnight wrote:

ChesswithNickolay wrote:

AunTheKnight wrote:

ChesswithNickolay wrote:

Arnaut10 wrote:

@ChesswithNickolay please cut the crap. What levels are you talking about? Calm down, being 1800 equals zero with behaviour like that. Dont act like know it all, better than all of you and stuff like that. Because we have the same rating now I have to say people I play and me myself still blunder and by that I mean A LOT. Simple tactics, free pieces, #M and what not. I have missed so many opportunities and also created some for my opponents. Only difference between anyone rated below is that I do it once in 5 games and they do it once in 2 games wheter or not it's taken adventage of. I myself am I believer that you should do whatever you want (&is allowed) in a chess game and nobody should tell you to resign or not. Its your own choice what to do, I can only give an advice based on my experience to lower rated guys and my opinion to higher rated ones. We may agree, we may not it doesn't matter at the end.

Dude at 1800 a mistake loses the game most of the time, not a blunder. lmao

If 2000s (FIDE) blunder, you do too.

Does a 2000 FIDE blunder in more than 50% of their games? NO!

You have a statistic on that? Source please.

50% of their games are wins.

Okay? And wins can have blunders in them? Still haven’t given me a source. Give me a source for that, too.

Give me a source saying that 2000 FIDE blunder and have their blunders punished and have at least 51% of their games like that.

I was with some at a tourney… they say they blunder a lot. Don’t know what else to say lol

AunTheKnight

Sep 21, 2021

0

#63

ChesswithNickolay wrote:

If I don't blunder and get punished by my opponent in most of my games and only do mistakes then the 2000 FIDE does so too.

Bet? I’m sure you blunder. I’ll post a game where you did soon.

AunTheKnight

Sep 21, 2021

0

#64

ChesswithNickolay wrote:

AunTheKnight wrote:

ChesswithNickolay wrote:

AunTheKnight wrote:

ChesswithNickolay wrote:

AunTheKnight wrote:

ChesswithNickolay wrote:

Arnaut10 wrote:

@ChesswithNickolay please cut the crap. What levels are you talking about? Calm down, being 1800 equals zero with behaviour like that. Dont act like know it all, better than all of you and stuff like that. Because we have the same rating now I have to say people I play and me myself still blunder and by that I mean A LOT. Simple tactics, free pieces, #M and what not. I have missed so many opportunities and also created some for my opponents. Only difference between anyone rated below is that I do it once in 5 games and they do it once in 2 games wheter or not it's taken adventage of. I myself am I believer that you should do whatever you want (&is allowed) in a chess game and nobody should tell you to resign or not. Its your own choice what to do, I can only give an advice based on my experience to lower rated guys and my opinion to higher rated ones. We may agree, we may not it doesn't matter at the end.

Dude at 1800 a mistake loses the game most of the time, not a blunder. lmao

If 2000s (FIDE) blunder, you do too.

Does a 2000 FIDE blunder in more than 50% of their games? NO!

You have a statistic on that? Source please.

50% of their games are wins.

Okay? And wins can have blunders in them? Still haven’t given me a source. Give me a source for that, too.

Give me a source saying that 2000 FIDE blunder and have their blunders punished and have at least 51% of their games like that.

Another straw man. If Carlsen blunders, 2000s definitely do. And I never said 51% of games were like that.

Queentaker007

Sep 21, 2021

0

#65

Why not?

Me personally usaully frustration, even one never nows...

x-0460907528

Sep 21, 2021

0

#66

SarvendraTS wrote:

Arnaut10 wrote:

Outcome of the game when you lose your queen almost always favors your opponent and will happen 99%. They just resign to not waste time since them losing is more likely than anything else.

sure, they have a higher chance of losing, but you can't just quit a game like that, its unsportsmanslike.

ok now i have read from chess.com members that it is unsportsmanlike to resign when you are down in material AND that it is unsportsmanlike NOT to resign when you are down in material. i guess you cant please everyone...

AunTheKnight

Sep 21, 2021

0

#67

ChesswithNickolay wrote:

AunTheKnight wrote:

ChesswithNickolay wrote:

AunTheKnight wrote:

ChesswithNickolay wrote:

AunTheKnight wrote:

ChesswithNickolay wrote:

AunTheKnight wrote:

ChesswithNickolay wrote:

Arnaut10 wrote:

@ChesswithNickolay please cut the crap. What levels are you talking about? Calm down, being 1800 equals zero with behaviour like that. Dont act like know it all, better than all of you and stuff like that. Because we have the same rating now I have to say people I play and me myself still blunder and by that I mean A LOT. Simple tactics, free pieces, #M and what not. I have missed so many opportunities and also created some for my opponents. Only difference between anyone rated below is that I do it once in 5 games and they do it once in 2 games wheter or not it's taken adventage of. I myself am I believer that you should do whatever you want (&is allowed) in a chess game and nobody should tell you to resign or not. Its your own choice what to do, I can only give an advice based on my experience to lower rated guys and my opinion to higher rated ones. We may agree, we may not it doesn't matter at the end.

Dude at 1800 a mistake loses the game most of the time, not a blunder. lmao

If 2000s (FIDE) blunder, you do too.

Does a 2000 FIDE blunder in more than 50% of their games? NO!

You have a statistic on that? Source please.

50% of their games are wins.

Okay? And wins can have blunders in them? Still haven’t given me a source. Give me a source for that, too.

Give me a source saying that 2000 FIDE blunder and have their blunders punished and have at least 51% of their games like that.

Another straw man. If Carlsen blunders, 2000s definitely do. And I never said 51% of games were like that.

Think about it. This forum is about resigning in lost positions. This lost position happened after the opponent blundered and the other opponent punished the blunder.

I told that most of my games have mistakes. Thus, if most of my games have blunders, it should be 51% of games where the opponent punished my blunder.

When did I say most?

AunTheKnight

Sep 21, 2021

0

#68

“People at my level don’t blunder!”

Gymstar

Sep 21, 2021

0

#69

respectfully? dont

Gymstar

Sep 21, 2021

0

#70

sorry I dont (not respectfully)

AunTheKnight

Sep 21, 2021

0

#71

ChesswithNickolay wrote:

AunTheKnight wrote:

“People at my level don’t blunder!”

That's unrated.

Okay, and?

Ubik42

Sep 21, 2021

0

#72

Why you need practice resigning I can do it pretty well even though I don’t get much practice at it

AunTheKnight

Sep 21, 2021

0

#73

ChesswithNickolay wrote:

https://chess.com/live#g=25999824499

Um... you are going to ignore all my other points? This is irrelevant too.

Immaculate_Slayer

Sep 21, 2021

0

#74

ChesswithNickolay escreveu:

AunTheKnight wrote:

ChesswithNickolay wrote:

AunTheKnight wrote:

ChesswithNickolay wrote:

AunTheKnight wrote:

ChesswithNickolay wrote:

Arnaut10 wrote:

@ChesswithNickolay please cut the crap. What levels are you talking about? Calm down, being 1800 equals zero with behaviour like that. Dont act like know it all, better than all of you and stuff like that. Because we have the same rating now I have to say people I play and me myself still blunder and by that I mean A LOT. Simple tactics, free pieces, #M and what not. I have missed so many opportunities and also created some for my opponents. Only difference between anyone rated below is that I do it once in 5 games and they do it once in 2 games wheter or not it's taken adventage of. I myself am I believer that you should do whatever you want (&is allowed) in a chess game and nobody should tell you to resign or not. Its your own choice what to do, I can only give an advice based on my experience to lower rated guys and my opinion to higher rated ones. We may agree, we may not it doesn't matter at the end.

Dude at 1800 a mistake loses the game most of the time, not a blunder. lmao

If 2000s (FIDE) blunder, you do too.

Does a 2000 FIDE blunder in more than 50% of their games? NO!

You have a statistic on that? Source please.

50% of their games are wins.

Okay? And wins can have blunders in them? Still haven’t given me a source. Give me a source for that, too.

Give me a source saying that 2000 FIDE blunder and have their blunders punished and have at least 51% of their games like that.

You are the one saying they don't blunder so you are the one who has to prove that

Where's your logic?

Immaculate_Slayer

Sep 21, 2021

0

#75

AunTheKnight escreveu:

ChesswithNickolay wrote:

https://chess.com/live#g=25999824499

Um... you are going to ignore all my other points? This is irrelevant too.

Lmao he does that all the time brother

Immaculate_Slayer

Sep 21, 2021

0

#76

ChesswithNickolay escreveu:

Immaculate_Slayer wrote:

ChesswithNickolay escreveu:

AunTheKnight wrote:

ChesswithNickolay wrote:

AunTheKnight wrote:

ChesswithNickolay wrote:

AunTheKnight wrote:

ChesswithNickolay wrote:

Arnaut10 wrote:

@ChesswithNickolay please cut the crap. What levels are you talking about? Calm down, being 1800 equals zero with behaviour like that. Dont act like know it all, better than all of you and stuff like that. Because we have the same rating now I have to say people I play and me myself still blunder and by that I mean A LOT. Simple tactics, free pieces, #M and what not. I have missed so many opportunities and also created some for my opponents. Only difference between anyone rated below is that I do it once in 5 games and they do it once in 2 games wheter or not it's taken adventage of. I myself am I believer that you should do whatever you want (&is allowed) in a chess game and nobody should tell you to resign or not. Its your own choice what to do, I can only give an advice based on my experience to lower rated guys and my opinion to higher rated ones. We may agree, we may not it doesn't matter at the end.

Dude at 1800 a mistake loses the game most of the time, not a blunder. lmao

If 2000s (FIDE) blunder, you do too.

Does a 2000 FIDE blunder in more than 50% of their games? NO!

You have a statistic on that? Source please.

50% of their games are wins.

Okay? And wins can have blunders in them? Still haven’t given me a source. Give me a source for that, too.

Give me a source saying that 2000 FIDE blunder and have their blunders punished and have at least 51% of their games like that.

You are the one saying they don't blunder so you are the one who has to prove that

Where's your logic?

I never told they do blunder, I told that a majority of their games are lost due to mistakes. The logic and IQ?

You said they don't blunder in most of their games

So you are the one to prove that...

Immaculate_Slayer

Sep 21, 2021

0

#77

ChesswithNickolay escreveu:

Immaculate_Slayer wrote:

ChesswithNickolay escreveu:

Immaculate_Slayer wrote:

ChesswithNickolay escreveu:

AunTheKnight wrote:

ChesswithNickolay wrote:

AunTheKnight wrote:

ChesswithNickolay wrote:

AunTheKnight wrote:

ChesswithNickolay wrote:

Arnaut10 wrote:

@ChesswithNickolay please cut the crap. What levels are you talking about? Calm down, being 1800 equals zero with behaviour like that. Dont act like know it all, better than all of you and stuff like that. Because we have the same rating now I have to say people I play and me myself still blunder and by that I mean A LOT. Simple tactics, free pieces, #M and what not. I have missed so many opportunities and also created some for my opponents. Only difference between anyone rated below is that I do it once in 5 games and they do it once in 2 games wheter or not it's taken adventage of. I myself am I believer that you should do whatever you want (&is allowed) in a chess game and nobody should tell you to resign or not. Its your own choice what to do, I can only give an advice based on my experience to lower rated guys and my opinion to higher rated ones. We may agree, we may not it doesn't matter at the end.

Dude at 1800 a mistake loses the game most of the time, not a blunder. lmao

If 2000s (FIDE) blunder, you do too.

Does a 2000 FIDE blunder in more than 50% of their games? NO!

You have a statistic on that? Source please.

50% of their games are wins.

Okay? And wins can have blunders in them? Still haven’t given me a source. Give me a source for that, too.

Give me a source saying that 2000 FIDE blunder and have their blunders punished and have at least 51% of their games like that.

You are the one saying they don't blunder so you are the one who has to prove that

Where's your logic?

I never told they do blunder, I told that a majority of their games are lost due to mistakes. The logic and IQ?

You said they don't blunder in most of their games

So you are the one to prove that...

Yes, they don't blunder in most of their games, and if they do, the opponent doesn't punish some of them. My proof is that most of my games lost due to a mistake, not blunders that are punished. I am even willing to play 5 unrated games to prove that. (I already played one.) Now prove that a 2000 has most of their games lost due to punished blunders.

This is not actual proof and I have to prove nothing as you are the one coming up with the statement.

Your statistics say nothing about 2000 FIDE.

AunTheKnight

Sep 21, 2021

0

#78

ChesswithNickolay wrote:

Immaculate_Slayer wrote:

ChesswithNickolay escreveu:

Immaculate_Slayer wrote:

ChesswithNickolay escreveu:

AunTheKnight wrote:

ChesswithNickolay wrote:

AunTheKnight wrote:

ChesswithNickolay wrote:

AunTheKnight wrote:

ChesswithNickolay wrote:

Arnaut10 wrote:

@ChesswithNickolay please cut the crap. What levels are you talking about? Calm down, being 1800 equals zero with behaviour like that. Dont act like know it all, better than all of you and stuff like that. Because we have the same rating now I have to say people I play and me myself still blunder and by that I mean A LOT. Simple tactics, free pieces, #M and what not. I have missed so many opportunities and also created some for my opponents. Only difference between anyone rated below is that I do it once in 5 games and they do it once in 2 games wheter or not it's taken adventage of. I myself am I believer that you should do whatever you want (&is allowed) in a chess game and nobody should tell you to resign or not. Its your own choice what to do, I can only give an advice based on my experience to lower rated guys and my opinion to higher rated ones. We may agree, we may not it doesn't matter at the end.

Dude at 1800 a mistake loses the game most of the time, not a blunder. lmao

If 2000s (FIDE) blunder, you do too.

Does a 2000 FIDE blunder in more than 50% of their games? NO!

You have a statistic on that? Source please.

50% of their games are wins.

Okay? And wins can have blunders in them? Still haven’t given me a source. Give me a source for that, too.

Give me a source saying that 2000 FIDE blunder and have their blunders punished and have at least 51% of their games like that.

You are the one saying they don't blunder so you are the one who has to prove that

Where's your logic?

I never told they do blunder, I told that a majority of their games are lost due to mistakes. The logic and IQ?

You said they don't blunder in most of their games

So you are the one to prove that...

Yes, they don't blunder in most of their games, and if they do, the opponent doesn't punish some of them. My proof is that most of my games lost due to a mistake, not blunders that are punished. I am even willing to play 5 unrated games to prove that. (I already played one.) Now prove that a 2000 has most of their games lost due to punished blunders.

You can't say something that bold and not expect people to ask for your source. Stop talking. More proof you are trolling.

Immaculate_Slayer

Sep 21, 2021

0

#79

ChesswithNickolay escreveu:

Immaculate_Slayer wrote:

ChesswithNickolay escreveu:

Immaculate_Slayer wrote:

ChesswithNickolay escreveu:

Immaculate_Slayer wrote:

ChesswithNickolay escreveu:

AunTheKnight wrote:

ChesswithNickolay wrote:

AunTheKnight wrote:

ChesswithNickolay wrote:

AunTheKnight wrote:

ChesswithNickolay wrote:

Arnaut10 wrote:

@ChesswithNickolay please cut the crap. What levels are you talking about? Calm down, being 1800 equals zero with behaviour like that. Dont act like know it all, better than all of you and stuff like that. Because we have the same rating now I have to say people I play and me myself still blunder and by that I mean A LOT. Simple tactics, free pieces, #M and what not. I have missed so many opportunities and also created some for my opponents. Only difference between anyone rated below is that I do it once in 5 games and they do it once in 2 games wheter or not it's taken adventage of. I myself am I believer that you should do whatever you want (&is allowed) in a chess game and nobody should tell you to resign or not. Its your own choice what to do, I can only give an advice based on my experience to lower rated guys and my opinion to higher rated ones. We may agree, we may not it doesn't matter at the end.

Dude at 1800 a mistake loses the game most of the time, not a blunder. lmao

If 2000s (FIDE) blunder, you do too.

Does a 2000 FIDE blunder in more than 50% of their games? NO!

You have a statistic on that? Source please.

50% of their games are wins.

Okay? And wins can have blunders in them? Still haven’t given me a source. Give me a source for that, too.

Give me a source saying that 2000 FIDE blunder and have their blunders punished and have at least 51% of their games like that.

You are the one saying they don't blunder so you are the one who has to prove that

Where's your logic?

I never told they do blunder, I told that a majority of their games are lost due to mistakes. The logic and IQ?

You said they don't blunder in most of their games

So you are the one to prove that...

Yes, they don't blunder in most of their games, and if they do, the opponent doesn't punish some of them. My proof is that most of my games lost due to a mistake, not blunders that are punished. I am even willing to play 5 unrated games to prove that. (I already played one.) Now prove that a 2000 has most of their games lost due to punished blunders.

This is not actual proof and I have to prove nothing as you are the one coming up with the statement.

Your statistics say nothing about 2000 FIDE.

They do. If I am an 1800 and most of my games are lost due to mistakes, more than certainly this would be the same for 2000 FIDE. I swear I am not trolling. Give me your source.

I have no source I'm literally giving you arguments based on logical elements

usernameone

Sep 21, 2021

0

#80

Some people are not happy unless they can hit a grand slam, a draw or a stalemate isn't rewarding to them apparently.