17187 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Well, I didn't expect my first thread here to spark a multi-layered controversy.
Clearly the barometer and conditions for resigning are different for many, and much more routine than I had expected.
I suspect my anticipation was that playing others through chess.com was considered a learning environment, and that a too-soon resignation would have been impolite to one's opponent... which was why I never did until all avenues were exhausted.
And likewise, when a game with a stronger opponent went to 69 moves, he down to just a King and a pawn, I wasn't impatient that he didn't resign.
Oh well. Thanks for all the input... I have a better (good) understanding of the ettiquite involved here.
I would say to just play for as long as you think you have a chance to stop your opponent from winning. I think it's nice to give respect to your opponent by resigning, but it's clearly not necessary. The rules are to play to checkmate or draw.
You resign when you want to resign for whatever reasons seem adequate to you. Nobody in the world has the right to say it was either too soon or not soon enough because it's not their call - it's yours. If they don't like that then they will not like the game of chess.
good than you might have fun with a King's Gambit or two... they rarely stay Quotidian for long
I'd agree with you, but I'm going to have to go look up quotidian first.
It means something very routine its almost an everyday occurance
@chess_gg, I take your point that I could have done as you did and just resigned (therefore the suffering was partially self-inflicted), but to be honest the thought never even crossed my mind, it was win the game now and worry about everything else later.
If you notice, is the OP the one who is saying that players here resign too early.
Well, I just never give up till the end and I dont know people think that is unpolite. I think game like real life. We should not give up, even we feel completely hopeless. I will fight till the end, even I know I will be lost. And I really like somebody who not resign too early. It is character, please dont think it is unsportmanship.
Resignation is prudent when the position is hopelessly lost. What "hopelessly lost" means is different for every player.
Does anyone else have this problem with sore losers?
by batgirl a few minutes ago
Millionaire Chess 3
by ChrisWainscott 3 minutes ago
G Butterman Chess Board
by wiscmike 4 minutes ago
Would a 2500 have a chance against a 2857?
by 0110001101101000 5 minutes ago
Here is how you get to 2000+ live blitz on chess.com
by gchess33 5 minutes ago
LOL Nakamura's hat
by ChrisWainscott 6 minutes ago
How to become more tactically aware as a beginner?
by gchess33 11 minutes ago
Calculatio is the most important skill
by MyRatingis1523 11 minutes ago
King's Gambit: Quaade Gambit
by G_kadas 11 minutes ago
by gustavtropolo 15 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
Try the new Chess.com!
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!