Why does no one accept my rematch?

cool , I have no idea why other people decline rematch requests only why I do ... at my level it's really just a blunder fest so there's nothing to learn from playing me twice anyway !  

I can't figure out how to respond to specifics comments on my phone.

When I read the original question I assumed we were talking bullet chess because longer games have too many clear answers. Maybe that's an unfair assumption. 

Someone also mentioned analyzing which is another fair point. I like to analyze but I'd rather rematch and analyze later. I use lichess so the system might work differently. With bullet I only analyze a third or so of my games. If people rematched that'd be lower.

Maybe a better example of the psychological breakdown is people who will let someone undo a clear drop mishap and those who don't. This has very limited excuses. I'd bet the people who rematch are the same ones who prefer to lose a good game than win because of a misclick. Maybe I'm projecting.

You say studying psychology and discussing it is dangerous, I think treating people on the internet with disdain is dangerous.

If what I'm saying is nonsense then why does it get a rise out of you?

I disabled takebacks on t'other site (though I almost never play there anyway) as soon as I realised they existed.  The rare number of times you may get a genuine one no way makes up for the possibilities of being spammed with silly takeback requests.

I rematched someone and they accepted then they resigned it was sad

I played someone on the other site, with the 3 second increment game going on 115 moves. I didnt know that the other site ignores the 50 move rule, and my one draw offer was declined. Before I realized I should have resigned in order not to play an eternal game, my opponent went in for a 'winning' move, which was bad on 2 fronts...the worst of which was that it was defended and the least of which wouldnt have changed the draw. My opponent then offered me a draw upon finding out he was losing as result. With the draw declined, he ran his time out and a rematch offered.

If you delusional to the point where you dont understand why there was no rematch, or you consider me delusional enough to rematch that player I dont know.

What does that have to do with peoples childhood?

what about 

A random game on the internet isn't a 'match' though, it's just a game against some person you don't know who doesn't matter and then you play a different person you don't know who doesn't matter, etc.

In tournaments, you only play your opponent once. 

Many of us play that way in person, but have experienced too many internet opponents who use assistance on the second game after you trounced them in the first. Bite me once, your fault. Bite me twice, my fault.

A good reason for playing tournaments is avoiding expectations of faux etiquette.

Whenever i have a close game i do accept the rematch, but if i lose and the hole game i was down in the position i don´t because i know i will most likely lose, unless it was a simple mistake in the opining.also irl time troubles, a lot of times in school i have enough time to play ~3   1 min games so i cant accept a rematch.

It's because theyre afraid of losing their "superiority." If they plan on playing another game right after, but refuse to rematch, it's pure cowardice. The excuses "I LiKe tO PlaY DiFfEreNt PeoPlE" is horse crap. 1. You can play unlimited games after against different people. 2. Switching colors and the new positions reached (especially in amateur chess) negate any "sameness" one would encounter in a rematch. Now, for those who say "I LiKe To AnAlYzE AfTeR." Well friend, you may easily analyze the game well after your rematch. Don't act as if reviewing it right away will lead to some immediate breakthrough that couldn't wait another few minutes of a game. People like to put up these as the most common excuses, but when put under the lense of analysis, are shown to be vapid and empty, giving no practical advantage of not rematching, and all that's left is the pure emotion of fear. As for "they'll cheat in the second game." Maybe. So what if they do? If this is what they do, report them and get your points back. I've noticed that people will come up with so much crap to make it seem like it's not a defect of competitive spirit, but when further examined, the reasons are just weak at best. I'd recommend those who do this and use these reasons to think, and feel within yourself. Most will be incapable or unwilling to admit they refuse rematches purely for self preservation, or maybe they never heard the points I've made. Either way, this attitude needs to stop.

Nobody needs a reason to not rematch, it's the default, they need a reason to rematch, and against some random nobody on the internet there is no such reason.