I criticise your flimsy dismissal of my magnificent expertise at dismissing expertise on flimsy grounds. It takes more to win an argument on flimsy grounds!
Thing is, by you, it's flimsy only if "nothing" or" void" can be counted flimsy. Cos the custom is to count individual, unsupported opinions for just, plain, nothing. And that's very much what your opinion is, considering the lack of support (your will doesn't count as support) you gave it.
So as there is no universally accepted authority on the matter and no solid ground upon which to base an argument all opinions are valid and discussion is pointless?
I think it was meant to carry his and Ziryab's opinion that all individual opinion is worthless, compared with the judgement of official, expert bodies, which they happen to agree with.
Someone said something about speaking for others and you keep crediting me with utterances I have not made.
CHESS It’s just a board game like GO, Checkers . . .