why is en passant a rule?

Sort:
Avatar of Tals-pet-rabid-chipmunk
I mean, it just seems completely random. Passing a pawn diagonally on a certain rank doesn't seem to add anything to the game. The only other rules that include a certain rank are queening and pawn moving two squares forward. But both seem logical. The en passant rule doesn't seem to have any specific purpose, so why does it exist? Am I missing something here?

(I accidentally posted this in chess openings, and don't know how to move it)
Avatar of knighttour2

It's not random.  If e.p. didn't exist, then as soon as someone got a pawn to the fifth rank, a person could move their neighboring pawn forward two spaces and lock up the position.  Example: you play a2-a4, then a5 and your opponent plays b7-b5.  Now you can't capture that pawn and the position remains closed.  Without e.p. many more games would feature impenetrable pawn walls all over the board and more games would end in draws because people would have to just shuffle pieces back and forth on their side of the "wall".  e.p. allows more captures and more open lines and thus more active play

Avatar of wanmokewan

It was introduced after the rule change to allow pawns to move two squares from their starting position so as to make the game go faster. Since that meant pawns on the 5th rank would lose the opportunity to capture a pawn that originally would have to move 1 square instead of two.

Avatar of wanmokewan

Didn't mean to double post, sorry.

Avatar of TRextastic

It seems like a very thoughtful balance to the rule that allows pawns to take two squares with their first move.