yea cuz it'd 550
Why is stockfish so bad?
Sort:
*its
May 24, 2022
0
#4
Yeah lol I’m terrible(unrated 1200) and just beat the Komodo25(3200) twice. I may be missing something about the bot difficulty but it had an accuracy of 50 something.
im not even sure how to answer that because it isn’t even a question, i guess its because its 550?
Mar 13, 2026
0
#6
Bejaysuz wrote:
I find stockfish terrible at analysing games afterwards. If I don’t take an obvious piece which to me was an obvious trap, it sees it as a mistake or blunder. If i use the fishing pole trap its bad all round until i get the checkmate and all of a sudden its a good move.
seems to me its incapable of seeing anything more than obvious moves..
Bro thinks he's smarter than a computer that was made to analyze chess games and makes Magnus Carlsen look like a fool in comparison 🤣 Delulu much?
Edit: It appears that this guy is so mad about being wrong that he immediately made an alt account without authorization, just to upvote his own comment and downvote mine.
Stay mad. 🤗
I played against 550 rated stockfish and [it just started blundering all of its pieces until it lost](https://www.chess.com/game/computer/8898441)! As a 550 player myself, this is not my experince at all. Well, kind of, but not that bad.
In fact, it is so bad, that I was able to beat all of the bots until 1.5k with three stars. Why is stockfish so bad when you don't give it its full power?